Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
Hi Nils,
is there some easy way to implement an nicer error message?
hmm, is
card.c:571:sc_list_files: called
card.c:573:sc_list_files: returning with: Not supported
sc_list_files() failed: Not supported
not quite precise ?
currently the driver falls back on the
Hi Nils,
is there some easy way to implement an nicer error message?
currently the driver falls back on the generic iso options. maybe instead
we should have a dummy function that returns an error, so we can
print some nice / easy to understand error message instead of a
backtrace with various fu
Justin Karneges wrote:
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 15:05, you wrote:
starcos 2.4 should already work (perhaps except for a missing ATR
but adding a new ATR is trivial and harmless change) as afaik the
differences between starcos spk 2.3 and starcos spk 2.4 are
negligible as far as opensc is conce
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 17:41, Chaskiel M Grundman wrote:
> --On Wednesday, March 22, 2006 05:19:06 PM -0800 Justin Karneges
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Could these problems be related to the openct driver, or are we done with
> > that? It would be nice to cross something off the list...
--On Wednesday, March 22, 2006 05:19:06 PM -0800 Justin Karneges
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Could these problems be related to the openct driver, or are we done with
that? It would be nice to cross something off the list...
looks like openct to me. I think we need to go back to ifdhandler tr
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 16:45, Chaskiel M Grundman wrote:
> --On Wednesday, March 22, 2006 03:52:20 PM -0800 Justin Karneges
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Wednesday 22 March 2006 15:05, you wrote:
> >
> > But --list-files does not:
> >
> ># opensc-tool - --list-files
> > card.c:5
--On Wednesday, March 22, 2006 03:52:20 PM -0800 Justin Karneges
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 15:05, you wrote:
But --list-files does not:
# opensc-tool - --list-files
card.c:571:sc_list_files: called
card.c:573:sc_list_files: returning with: Not supported
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 15:05, you wrote:
> starcos 2.4 should already work (perhaps except for a missing ATR
> but adding a new ATR is trivial and harmless change) as afaik the
> differences between starcos spk 2.3 and starcos spk 2.4 are
> negligible as far as opensc is concerned.
I've added
Justin Karneges wrote:
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 13:57, Nils Larsch wrote:
unless someone has something extremly important that needs
to be included in the upcoming 0.11 release I would like
to announce a feature freeze for 0.11.
I'd really like to get my eutron card working in the next versi
On Wednesday 22 March 2006 13:57, Nils Larsch wrote:
> unless someone has something extremly important that needs
> to be included in the upcoming 0.11 release I would like
> to announce a feature freeze for 0.11.
I'd really like to get my eutron card working in the next version. What's the
sche
unless someone has something extremly important that needs
to be included in the upcoming 0.11 release I would like
to announce a feature freeze for 0.11.
Cheers,
Nils
___
opensc-devel mailing list
opensc-devel@lists.opensc-project.org
http://www.opensc
11 matches
Mail list logo