Hello,
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 13:47, Kalev Lember ka...@smartlink.ee wrote:
On 12/07/2010 05:21 PM, Frank Morgner wrote:
You're not supposed to link against libopensc via the sc_* API but use
PKCS#11. It is possible but not encouraged, thus the .pc file is
removed.
Why is it not encouraged?
Hi!
You're not supposed to link against libopensc via the sc_* API but use
PKCS#11. It is possible but not encouraged, thus the .pc file is
removed.
Why is it not encouraged?
The effort that would be required to have a well designed and
documented public API and maintain required
Frank Morgner wrote:
You're not supposed to link against libopensc via the sc_* API
but use PKCS#11. It is possible but not encouraged,
Why is it not encouraged?
The effort that would be required to have a well designed and
documented public API and maintain required
On 12/07/2010 05:21 PM, Frank Morgner wrote:
Hi!
You're not supposed to link against libopensc via the sc_* API but use
PKCS#11. It is possible but not encouraged, thus the .pc file is
removed.
Why is it not encouraged?
Why do you need libopensc.pc (or what is linking agains libopensc)?
Hi!
You're not supposed to link against libopensc via the sc_* API but use
PKCS#11. It is possible but not encouraged, thus the .pc file is
removed.
Why is it not encouraged?
Why do you need libopensc.pc (or what is linking agains libopensc)?
I am using smart card abstraction offered by
Is there any reason with libopensc.pc is not installed? It looks
like r4081 deleted the line:
pkgconfig_DATA = libopensc.pc
Was this on purpose?
--
Douglas E. Engert deeng...@anl.gov
Argonne National Laboratory
9700 South Cass Avenue
Argonne, Illinois 60439
(630) 252-5444
On Dec 6, 2010, at 7:18 PM, Douglas E. Engert wrote:
Is there any reason with libopensc.pc is not installed? It looks
like r4081 deleted the line:
pkgconfig_DATA = libopensc.pc
Was this on purpose?
You're not supposed to link against libopensc via the sc_* API but use PKCS#11.
It is
