Re: [opensc-devel] pam_pkcs11 broken

2008-02-25 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Montag, 25. Februar 2008 11:28:21 schrieb Ludovic Rousseau: > I added the missing files (I guess) > > I can now do: > $ svn co trunk > $ cd trunk > $ ./bootstrap > $ ./configure > $ make distcheck ok, thanks a lot! will see if tonight snapshot cron job now works. good night, Andreas _

Re: [opensc-devel] pam_pkcs11 broken

2008-02-25 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 1:39 PM, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 15:36:05 schrieb Ludovic Rousseau: > > > I have no real objection to add po/Makefile.in.in anc config.rpath > > (and others) in SVN. They both are installed by running gettextize. > > Th

Re: [opensc-devel] pam_pkcs11 broken

2008-02-23 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2008 15:36:05 schrieb Ludovic Rousseau: > I have no real objection to add po/Makefile.in.in anc config.rpath > (and others) in SVN. They both are installed by running gettextize. > They can be updated if needed. can you do so? at least my versions of the tools didn't create

Re: [opensc-devel] pam_pkcs11 broken

2008-02-22 Thread Ludovic Rousseau
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:30 AM, Andreas Jellinghaus <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > po/Makefile.in.in is missing from svn. > > any reason not to add it? Because it is (re)created by gettextize? > I can generate it with gettextize, but that changes lots of other stuff as > well, so I don't think

Re: [opensc-devel] pam_pkcs11 broken

2008-02-22 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
also Makefile.am mentions config.rpath - which is not available on my system or not installed (guess it can be deleted). after "make maintainer-clean" I noticed a number of files still there - "svn log" doesn't show them because of svn:ignore property, but a diff with an untouched checkout shows

[opensc-devel] pam_pkcs11 broken

2008-02-22 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
po/Makefile.in.in is missing from svn. any reason not to add it? I can generate it with gettextize, but that changes lots of other stuff as well, so I don't think we want that command in bootstrap script. I guess the svn ignore on "*.in" cought it and thus it was only forgotten by accident, but