Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Huie-Ying Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> After I found the automake, autoconf and libtool on Solaris, I tried to
>> run bootstrap, but it failed with
>>
>>
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Huie-Ying Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> We are porting the version 0.6.0 of the pam_pkcs11 source officially,
>> however, I would like to take a look at the latest revision of source. How
>> can I see the revision 319 and 320 ?
>
On Mon, Mar 31, 2008 at 11:17 PM, Huie-Ying Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After I found the automake, autoconf and libtool on Solaris, I tried to run
> bootstrap, but it failed with
>
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]/bootstra
Huie-Ying Lee wrote:
> Peter Stuge wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 06:27:02PM -0700, Huie-Ying Lee wrote:
>>> I found that Solaris doesn't support "automake", "aclocal" and
>>> "libtoolize" commands currently
>>
>> I suggest that you install automake, autoconf and libtool in order to
>> work more
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 3:13 AM, Huie-Ying Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> We are porting the version 0.6.0 of the pam_pkcs11 source officially,
> however, I would like to take a look at the latest revision of source. How
> can I see the revision 319 and 320 ?
Use subversion
$ svn checkout h
Peter Stuge wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 06:27:02PM -0700, Huie-Ying Lee wrote:
>> I found that Solaris doesn't support "automake", "aclocal" and
>> "libtoolize" commands currently
>
> I suggest that you install automake, autoconf and libtool in order to
> work more efficiently with this and m
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 06:27:02PM -0700, Huie-Ying Lee wrote:
> I found that Solaris doesn't support "automake", "aclocal" and
> "libtoolize" commands currently
I suggest that you install automake, autoconf and libtool in order to
work more efficiently with this and many other software packages.
Douglas E. Engert wrote:
>
>
> Huie-Ying Lee wrote:
> [...]
>>>
I changed the above code tp the code below and added the
-DSUN_SOLARIS flag to the Maekfile.am file.
> [...]
However, the resulting file still picked up the original line. It
seems that the generated
Huie-Ying Lee wrote:
[...]
>>
>>> I changed the above code tp the code below and added the
>>> -DSUN_SOLARIS flag to the Maekfile.am file.
>>>
[...]
>>>
>>> However, the resulting file still picked up the original line. It
>>> seems that the generated Makefile file doesn't recognize the new
>
Ludovic Rousseau wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Huie-Ying Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Q2: To meet the Solaris file location convention, I changed the default
>> location of the pam_pkcs11.conf file in the pam_config.c file. To reserve
>> the original code, I used CPP "#ifdef"
Douglas E. Engert wrote:
Thank you for your help. Please see my comments below ...
>
>
> Huie-Ying Lee wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>
>> I'm a Solaris engineer at Sun Micros. We have been working on porting
>> the OpenSC/pam_pkcs11 module, version 0.6.0, to Solaris. During the
>> porting, I encounter
On Fri, Mar 21, 2008 at 12:51 AM, Huie-Ying Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Q2: To meet the Solaris file location convention, I changed the default
> location of the pam_pkcs11.conf file in the pam_config.c file. To reserve
> the original code, I used CPP "#ifdef" to differenciate the new code
Huie-Ying Lee wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> I'm a Solaris engineer at Sun Micros. We have been working on porting the
> OpenSC/pam_pkcs11 module, version 0.6.0, to Solaris. During the porting, I
> encountered a couple of build issues and I would appreciate if you can help
> me with them.
>
> Q1: Acc
Hi,
I'm a Solaris engineer at Sun Micros. We have been working on porting the
OpenSC/pam_pkcs11 module, version 0.6.0, to Solaris. During the porting, I
encountered a couple of build issues and I would appreciate if you can help me
with them.
Q1: According to the configure.in file, the defa
14 matches
Mail list logo
