Re: [opensc-devel] "versioning" opensc on card format

2010-01-03 Thread Viktor TARASOV
Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > Am Montag 14 Dezember 2009 14:28:21 schrieb Martin Paljak: > >> On 14.12.2009, at 15:17, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: >> >>> Hi, >>> >>> is there a way to put a version on the card in some structure? >>> so we can write code that sees: >>> * ah, not initialized wi

Re: [opensc-devel] "versioning" opensc on card format

2009-12-14 Thread Dominik Fischer
Am Montag, den 14.12.2009, 16:03 +0100 schrieb Andreas Jellinghaus: > Am Montag 14 Dezember 2009 14:28:21 schrieb Martin Paljak: > > On 14.12.2009, at 15:17, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > > Hi, > > > > > > is there a way to put a version on the card in some structure? > > > so we can write code th

Re: [opensc-devel] "versioning" opensc on card format

2009-12-14 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Am Montag 14 Dezember 2009 14:28:21 schrieb Martin Paljak: > On 14.12.2009, at 15:17, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > > Hi, > > > > is there a way to put a version on the card in some structure? > > so we can write code that sees: > > * ah, not initialized with opensc > > * ah, initialized with opensc

Re: [opensc-devel] "versioning" opensc on card format

2009-12-14 Thread Martin Paljak
On 14.12.2009, at 15:17, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote: > Hi, > > is there a way to put a version on the card in some structure? > so we can write code that sees: > * ah, not initialized with opensc > * ah, initialized with opensc (old version) > * good, initialized with opensc (new version) Probab

[opensc-devel] "versioning" opensc on card format

2009-12-14 Thread Andreas Jellinghaus
Hi, is there a way to put a version on the card in some structure? so we can write code that sees: * ah, not initialized with opensc * ah, initialized with opensc (old version) * good, initialized with opensc (new version) if we can do that, it would help to limit some hacked workaround to onl