Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> Am Montag 14 Dezember 2009 14:28:21 schrieb Martin Paljak:
>
>> On 14.12.2009, at 15:17, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> is there a way to put a version on the card in some structure?
>>> so we can write code that sees:
>>> * ah, not initialized wi
Am Montag, den 14.12.2009, 16:03 +0100 schrieb Andreas Jellinghaus:
> Am Montag 14 Dezember 2009 14:28:21 schrieb Martin Paljak:
> > On 14.12.2009, at 15:17, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > is there a way to put a version on the card in some structure?
> > > so we can write code th
Am Montag 14 Dezember 2009 14:28:21 schrieb Martin Paljak:
> On 14.12.2009, at 15:17, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > is there a way to put a version on the card in some structure?
> > so we can write code that sees:
> > * ah, not initialized with opensc
> > * ah, initialized with opensc
On 14.12.2009, at 15:17, Andreas Jellinghaus wrote:
> Hi,
>
> is there a way to put a version on the card in some structure?
> so we can write code that sees:
> * ah, not initialized with opensc
> * ah, initialized with opensc (old version)
> * good, initialized with opensc (new version)
Probab
Hi,
is there a way to put a version on the card in some structure?
so we can write code that sees:
* ah, not initialized with opensc
* ah, initialized with opensc (old version)
* good, initialized with opensc (new version)
if we can do that, it would help to limit some hacked workaround
to onl