Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC with or without OpenSSL -???What???is?the?direction?

2010-10-12 Thread Viktor TARASOV
Hello, Frank Morgner wrote: What are the limitations in OpenSC? >>> 1. There is no kind of abstraction in the current SM code. At the >>> moment every card driver implements its own version of secure >>> messaging. SM is not implemented by card driver, but the separate SM pr

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC with or???without?OpenSSL?-???What???is?the?direction?

2010-10-12 Thread Frank Morgner
Hi! On Tuesday, October 12 at 10:33AM, Viktor TARASOV wrote: > >>> 1. There is no kind of abstraction in the current SM code. At the > >>> moment every card driver implements its own version of secure > >>> messaging. > > SM is not implemented by card driver, but the separate SM procedures. > T

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC with or???without?OpenSSL?-???What???is?the?direction?

2010-10-12 Thread Viktor TARASOV
Frank Morgner wrote: > Hi! > > On Tuesday, October 12 at 10:33AM, Viktor TARASOV wrote: > > 1. There is no kind of abstraction in the current SM code. At the > moment every card driver implements its own version of secure > messaging. > >> SM is not implemented by ca

Re: [opensc-devel] OpenSC changes to support non RSA public keys in Certificates, public and private keys

2010-10-12 Thread Douglas E. Engert
As outlined below, in a note from 10/6, changes were committed (r4805) today, with slight modifications. o sc_pkcs15_pubkey_from_cert was moved from pkcs15-pubkey.c to pkcs15-cert.c, and now calls parse_x509_cert. It no longer depends on OpenSSL, I can now easily work with more then RSA