Re: [Opensim-dev] mantis resolved vs. closed

Hi, On Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:47:14 -0600 James Stallings II wrote: > suppose instead of setting the ticket to 'resolved' and closing it, > we set it to 'resolution pending test' and leave it open I don't think there's enough difference between "resolved" and "resolution pending test". Also I don'

Re: [Opensim-dev] weird idea #2: inworld applications - access toclient's widget set?

Ah, I wasn’t aware of this technical paper (anymore), thanks for the link. Yes, I am very much hoping that one of these two emerges over the standard viewer. Someone I know recently compiled it, and gathering of libs/versions and compilation seemed to be not for the faint of heart. It seems to

Re: [Opensim-dev] weird idea #2: inworld applications - access to client's widget set?

There are two "ground up" viewer projects that I'm aware of, Idealist and Openviewer. Here is a site which discusses them from a technical perspective: http://playsign.fi/engine/rex/viewerarchs Idealist can be found at: http://forge.opensimulator.org/gf/project/idealistviewer/ Openviewer can be fou

Re: [Opensim-dev] weird idea #2: inworld applications - access to client's widget set?

Well, I'm glad someone's at least taking a swipe at the client from a usability standpoint although it would be nice if they like a few of the other client projects I've seen would consider starting with a ground up rebuild of the code base. At least not only to solve the gpl vs bsd vs proble

Re: [Opensim-dev] weird idea #2: inworld applications - access to client's widget set?

That would most likely require modifications to the sl viewer. I think the Imprudence project is looking at providing a viewer with similar capabilities: http://imprudenceviewer.org/ On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 12:18 PM, John Sheridan wrote: > While on the topic of weird ideas and in world apps...

Re: [Opensim-dev] Regions larger then 256x256

your friends list with Windows Live Spaces. It's easy! http://spaces.live.com/spacesapi.aspx?wx_action=create&wx_url=/friends.aspx&; mkt=en-us -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: https://lists.berlios.de/

Re: [Opensim-dev] weird idea #2: inworld applications - access to client's widget set?

While on the topic of weird ideas and in world apps... I posted this idea to the Lindens about a year ago back when I was first trying to figure out LSL, but it likely went off to the noobie duh bin as at the time I pretty much asked them to include a copy of Visual Basic in world :P Anywho,

Re: [Opensim-dev] weird idea #2: inworld applications

*sigh* http://www.raphkoster.com/2009/01/27/rogue-leaders-excerpt-on-habitat/ -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- Von: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de im Auftrag von Dahlia Trimble Gesendet: Di 27.01.2009 09:02 An: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de Betreff: Re: [Opensim-dev] weird idea #2: inworl

Re: [Opensim-dev] Regions larger then 256x256

How about allowing global scale change which would affect everything else except terrain. If you would divide object scales by 10 you would have regions of size 2560x2560. This of couse would be grid wide setting and grids making hyper grid links should share the scale settings. Would this be feasi

Re: [Opensim-dev] Conversion to IClientCore

There is also IClientFileTransfer (and LLFileTransfer) that I moving all the err client file transfer code. But thats still a work in progress. Charles Krinke wrote: This seems like a capital idea to me and will allow OpenSim to more easily have modules added for other, non-secondlife clients

Re: [Opensim-dev] Conversion to IClientCore

This seems like a capital idea to me and will allow OpenSim to more easily have modules added for other, non-secondlife clients in the future in addition to making the current modrex project move more smoothly. So, lets get going. I have looked at the http://opensimulator.org/wiki/OpenSim_0.6_IC

Re: [Opensim-dev] mantis resolved vs. closed

I can certainly appreciate the problem of abandoned mantii - most of them are. I think what caught me off-guard here is idb and I were actively working the issue - and without me knowing the ticket would be resolved as it was (automatically) it gave a certain appearance that did not reflect well o

Re: [Opensim-dev] weird idea #2: inworld applications

Flash support seems to be supported in rex (with the rex server) but has not yet been tested in modrex. See: http://rexdeveloper.org/wiki/index.php?title=Features_supported_currently under "MediaURL: flash support" So, the dream may be close to reality. -p Nebadon Izumi wrote: > if we could get

Re: [Opensim-dev] weird idea #2: inworld applications

if we could get some level of flash support we could run a c64 emulator written in Flash. I think supporting flash would open the doors to many applications inside OpenSim, but alas, without a new viewer or the lindens support for Flash this is nothing more than a dream right now. Hopefully one d

Re: [Opensim-dev] Source tree cleanup

Jeff Ames wrote: > Hello, > > There are a few dusty corners in trunk from before > forge.opensimulator.org was up, but I was wondering about moving them > over, or merging them with core. > > * OpenSim/Tools/LaunchSLClient > > Can this be merged with the SL Launcher project on forge? > (http

Re: [Opensim-dev] TSB Feasibility Study: Online Virtual Worlds for Urban Regeneration Consultation

Ben Francis wrote: > Hi, > > Firstly, thank you for all the responses, it gives me a good starting point. > > On Tue, Jan 20, 2009 at 7:16 AM, Dr Scofield > wrote: > > > as we are looking at similar OpenSim applications, i'd be interested > in learning

Re: [Opensim-dev] mantis resolved vs. closed

Nebadon Izumi wrote: > I always saw it as that when a developer or someone marked a ticket as > resolved it meant they made an attempt to resolve this item and that the > filer needs to test it and either close the ticket or re-open back to a > true bug status, and only the reporter should close

Re: [Opensim-dev] Regions larger then 256x256

I did have another idea about simulator links which I wanted to post about as well. I don't think region groups are that bad to create larger regions, but the problem is the way they are individually managed. The thing I personally have against making larger regions from 256x256 square groups i

Re: [Opensim-dev] Regions larger then 256x256

I think with a bit of trickery its also possible to have multiple region servers managing a 256X256 area. As apart from terrain, a region can tell a client that objects are outside its own 256X256 area. So if you had 9 regions set up in a 3X3 array. With the centre 256x256 area being where eve

Re: [Opensim-dev] weird idea #2: inworld applications

Nice!! Didn't think of that. Von: opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de [mailto:opensim-dev-boun...@lists.berlios.de] Im Auftrag von Dahlia Trimble Gesendet: Dienstag, 27. Januar 2009 09:02 An: opensim-dev@lists.berlios.de Betreff: Re: [Opensim-dev] weird idea #2: inworld applications Not su

Re: [Opensim-dev] weird idea #2: inworld applications

Not sure how to get a c64 emulator to work in opensim, but if it can be done it should be playing Habitat: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VVpulhO3jyc One solution may be to stream a video of the emulator display. On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 11:51 PM, Dirk Krause wrote: > Hi, > > this thing came up