Hi:
For those of you who could be interested I have uploaded to sourceforge the
code and documentation for unga, my UGAIM server projects programmed in PHP
and based on Code Igniter framework.
I haven't finished yet all the testing, but is 100% operative for Apache
(windows & *IX) and php 5.2.X (
Impalah,
How does unga compare to simian? Does it use it's own connectors? About
writing for django/tornado: i'm currently writing a webfrontend(hwios,
http://forge.opensimulator.org/gf/project/hwios/) with python/django and
twisted(comparable to tornado), and have done alot of basic stuff so f
Hi,
unga is another support system for opensimulators, like robust (former
ugaim) or simian. I haven't tested simian (I only know the
documentation on google code) so I can't compare them :-(
¿Connectors? Well, the same as robust, by now. Only http connectors
(REST, xml-rpc and so on). The web se
One problem i see with this, is that from the OpenSimulator perspective,
UGAIM has been removed from the code and Replaced with ROBUST services,
which are vastly different. It seems like a huge mistake to try to
replicate something thats no longer being used, are your plans to bring this
up to a R
Hi,
Which are the differences on the published public interfaces between
old UGAIM and ROBUST? Maybe I'm totally wrong but I can't see anyone:
both use http, both use xml-rpc/REST/DAV/whatever.
The way it does its job is irrelevant. ugaim and robust both are serving http.
If you need an asset th
I don't know all the of the differences honestly, I was not trying to
discourage you from doing it, but i do know that the older versions of
OpenSimulator that conneceted to the C# UGAIM services will no longer
connect to C# Robust Backed services, my only concern was you might spend a
lot of time
Please excuse my "violent" reaction. I misunderstood your comments.
As soon as I have some free time (I suppose, for the weekend) I will test
unga with the newer (development) opensim versions. According to the wiki
there shouldn't be any problem, but maybe I forgot some needed interface.
Take in
Impalah, I'm very curious if you can do some testing in performance php Vs
c#
it might be even possible that php is more performant than c# and so more
scalable.
If your php sources are easy enough to be understandable it might be used
for educational purposes, i.e. to teach people how opensim work
for my opinion (i like to give opinion when nobody is aking me :))
instead of building a parralel dev for opensim<->php, maybe this can
be better to help simiangrid enhancements
the interest of unga is to be compatible with versions < 0.7 but for
0.7+ this can be better to use simiangrid
2010/4/7
The tests shouldn't be php vs c#, I think. PHP can be deployed on apache,
lighttpd, iss... can be used mod_php or cgi/fastcgi and this can affect
performance and code caches like apc or zend can be used to provide
something like bytecode.
For testing http I will use apache "ab". The easier tests c
Impalah Shenzhou wrote:
Please excuse my "violent" reaction. I misunderstood your comments.
As soon as I have some free time (I suppose, for the weekend) I will
test unga with the newer (development) opensim versions. According to
the wiki there shouldn't be any problem, but maybe I forgot som
That's what I wanted to say, but my drawing abilities are non-existent :-P
The "support" services for opensim can be anything while they use http and
implement the methods the simulator needs. Anyway, I repeat, unga is just
another option.
Cheers
2010/4/8 Justin Clark-Casey
> Impalah Shenzho
Hi,
"The methods the simulator needs" have changed considerably from 0.6.x
to pre-0.7. Hence the good advice that many people have voiced that you
look into what's coming rather than looking into the past. Looking into
what's coming means looking in pre-0.7 code, OpenSim.Services.Interfaces
-
Thanks for the advices Diva :-)
Actually I prefer to make unga compatible with robust implementation. From
my point of view robust is the standard into the opensim core and I am not
designing a new architecture for support servers... yet :-P
Cheers
2010/4/8 Diva Canto
> Hi,
>
> "The methods
Wow! Things changed a lot! (and they improved using REST). I really like the
refactoring, things are clear as water.
Just a question, about logins: the old "login_to_simulator" xml-rpc call is
the only one that "sl compatible" viewers launch, isn't it? This is the only
one that a grid (or auth ser
Ups! forget that, it has been answered weeks ago...
Sorry
2010/4/9 Impalah Shenzhou
> Wow! Things changed a lot! (and they improved using REST). I really like
> the refactoring, things are clear as water.
>
> Just a question, about logins: the old "login_to_simulator" xml-rpc call is
> the onl
16 matches
Mail list logo
