On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 13:56 -0600, Nicolas Williams wrote:
> What about class action scripts that can't run in alternate boot / LU?
Well, JDS doesn't have any so an example would help me picture
it. I would normally recommend using class action scripts when
it's simple enough to be scriptable an
On Mon, 2008-02-04 at 20:29 -0500, Sebastien Roy wrote:
> John Fischer wrote:
> > Instead, JDS in Nevada uses postrun for running these programs.
> > Postrun generalizes the above idea by putting the complex
> > script into a shared script (postrun itself) and using a
> > single smf
A question for LSARC regarding these libs:
Given that these are c++ libs, is it acceptable to ship
duplicate copies built with g++ (/usr/sfw/bin/g++) and if
so, where should they be installed?
Why would that be useful? For building gtkmm-based
applications that are difficult (to say the least) t
Yes,
these API should be labeled as "Committed" .
James Carlson wrote:
> Irene Huang writes:
>
>> There are many projects that use gc, including
>>
> [...]
>
>> /usr/lib/libcord.so Volatilelibrary
>> /usr/lib/libgc.so Volatile
>So that's the earliest they will be run. At the other end,
>gnome-session waits for all postrun scripts in the JDS_wait
>class to complete before the session is started. (A progress bar
>is displayed, the label is something like 'completing post
>installation confirugation'.).
>
>The current c
Danek Duvall wrote:
>
>
>> /usr/lib/libglibmm_generate_extra_defs-2.4.so Volatile
>>
>
> Does anyone ever need to link to this library specifically? This seems
> like a very private implementation detail that should either be a filter
> library or simply not exist on Solaris.
one comment.
a boolean "high-speed" property makes sense when there are only
two speeds available (ie, use 1.0 and usb 2.0) but i keep hearing
about usb 3.x compared with the next version of firewire, etc.
perhaps something more future proof would make sense for a committed
interfaces?
ed
ps - i ha
On Thu, Jan 31, 2008 at 07:03:47AM -0800, Glenn Faden wrote:
> James Carlson wrote:
> >Jarrett Lu writes:
> >
> >>So far, I don't see a cliff yet. Ed's concern is mostly about not
> >>cleaning up
> >>default routes after zones are halted. While I think Ed has a point, I
> >>don't
> >>see zones not
Edward Pilatowicz wrote:
> one comment.
> a boolean "high-speed" property makes sense when there are only
> two speeds available (ie, use 1.0 and usb 2.0) but i keep hearing
> about usb 3.x compared with the next version of firewire, etc.
> perhaps something more future proof would make sense for a
Laszlo (Laca) Peter wrote:
> gnome-session waits for all postrun scripts in the JDS_wait
A few questions/comments ...
jmp-1) Brand and organization names like JDS should never be used in
architectural level artifacts - rather a descriptive word should
be used instead.
jmp-2) There should be a
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:19:56PM +0800, simon.zheng at sun.com wrote:
> Danek Duvall wrote:
>
>>> /usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/proc/gmmprocVolatile
>>
>> What goes here and why is it Public?
>
> Gtkmm or other libraries needs this program to generate gtkmm-style source
Simon:
>>> /usr/lib/libglibmm_generate_extra_defs-2.4.so Volatile
>>>
>>
>> Does anyone ever need to link to this library specifically? This seems
>> like a very private implementation detail that should either be a filter
>> library or simply not exist on Solaris.
>>
> Fin
Brian Cameron wrote:
>
> Simon:
>
/usr/lib/libglibmm_generate_extra_defs-2.4.so Volatile
>>>
>>> Does anyone ever need to link to this library specifically? This seems
>>> like a very private implementation detail that should either be a filter
>>> library or simply
Danek Duvall wrote:
> I'll echo Jim's comments in the SQLite case about calling everything
> Volatile. It's really not appropriate, especially since these are
> components that exist specifically for other projects to build on top of.
>
I take your point about not to throw "Volatile" at every
Danek Duvall wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 06:19:56PM +0800, simon.zheng at sun.com wrote:
>
>
>> Danek Duvall wrote:
>>
>>
/usr/lib/glibmm-2.4/proc/gmmprocVolatile
>>> What goes here and why is it Public?
>>>
>> Gtkmm or other
> I was initially going to send a very similar comment then I remembered
> that "high-speed" is actually USB terminology in common use.
>
> IMO it wasn't forward thinking terminology for considering future faster
> (even-higher-speed then no-really-we-mean-it-this-time-high-speed) but
> looked
* John Plocher [2008-02-05 15:00]:
> jmp-3) How does this relate to the work being done in IPS, which is also
> trying to fix/eliminate postinstall scripts?
Image packaging will need something like postrun, but I would expect
to see the actual commands delivered as files, rather than via a pi
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.64 07/13/07 SMI
This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
BIGNUM kernel module
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
Author: Ferenc Rakoczi
1.3 Date of This Document
On Mon, Feb 04, 2008 at 10:41:16AM -0800, John Fischer wrote:
> Several software projects ship with programs needed for updating the
> project's databases or caches whenever the configuration changes or
> new files/data added that invalidate the cache. Examples from the
> GNOME wo
Stephen Hahn wrote:
> I'd also like to separate the tasks that need
> to be done every reboot/reconstruction from version-specific
> transitions, which I don't believe is done in the current tool.
>
I'm behind in this discussion (so maybe I'm missing something), but isn't
"reboot" somethin
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:12:55AM +0100, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
> I note that this is a lot worse for people who update biweekly,,
> but I also wonder why postrun needs to run at standard priority?
>
> Some systems will run certain services faster and appear up more quickly
> if postrun is
>On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:12:55AM +0100, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>> I note that this is a lot worse for people who update biweekly,,
>> but I also wonder why postrun needs to run at standard priority?
>>
>> Some systems will run certain services faster and appear up more quickly
>> if post
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
> So what will happen when you lvieupgrade the same partition twice without
> even once booting into it? That's easily done and should not cause
> any breakage.
Well, our class action scripts tend to be written so this just w
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 09:11:26PM +0100, Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote:
>> So what will happen when you lvieupgrade the same partition twice without
>> even once booting into it? That's easily done and should not cause
>> any breakage.
>
> Well, our class action scripts
On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 09:12 +0100, Casper.Dik at sun.com wrote:
> I find that postrun currently is an abomination (or at least the
> consumers are); it runs 10,000s of processes (literally) and takes
> a long time; making it public would likely make this worse.
The amount of run-on-first-boot wo
>
>On Tue, 2008-02-05 at 09:12 +0100, Casper.Dik at sun.com wrote:
>> I find that postrun currently is an abomination (or at least the
>> consumers are); it runs 10,000s of processes (literally) and takes
>> a long time; making it public would likely make this worse.
>
>The amount of run-on-first
On Tue, Feb 05, 2008 at 12:51:09PM -0800, Bart Smaalders wrote:
> /etc/passwd is one of the examples of something we're handling
> at install time w/ IPS; the packaging system has to know how
> to manipulate this file in order to install new files owned
> by new users correctly.
I thought IPS woul
Artem Kachitchkine wrote:
> 1.5 Mbit/s is Low-Speed
> 12 Mbit/s is Full-Speed
> 480 Mbit/s is Hi-Speed
>
> Rumor has it, the USB 3.0 mode will be called "SuperSpeed".
Then I would guess that USB-4.0 mode will be called "UltraSparc" ;-)
J?rg
--
EMail:joerg at schily.isdn.cs.tu-berlin.de (home
Brian,
This fast track was approved today during the LSARC business
portion of the meeting.
Thanks,
John
: proposal.txt
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080205/d31306c7/attachment.txt>
30 matches
Mail list logo
