logrotate [LSARC/2008/359 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Ceri Davies
non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: not available Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 187 bytes Desc: not available URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080603/1b43da99/attachment.bin>

ejabberd instant messaging server [PSARC/2008/340 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Raymond Xiong
On 06/02/08, Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Mon, Jun 02, 2008 at 11:12:32AM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote: > > Raymond Xiong wrote: > > >Two more notes on user authentication: > > > > > >1) ejabberd also supports PAM authentication. So it is possible to > > >use UNIX accounts for ejabberd user authen

removal of kadm5.keytab [PSARC/2008/358 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Mark Phalan
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 10:58 -0400, James Carlson wrote: > Mark Phalan writes: > > > > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 09:49 -0400, James Carlson wrote: > > > OK. Perhaps the file should be deleted on system upgrade, so that the > > > user doesn't try to do something silly, like modify the file and > > > e

logrotate [LSARC/2008/359 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Octave Orgeron
Agreed. I stopped using logrotate when I moved to Solaris 9 and transitioned to logadm. The big difference I see between the tools is the configuration file syntax(logadm.conf is simpler) and the fact that logadm.conf contains the time stamp info. Other than that, the functionality is the same.

logrotate [LSARC/2008/359 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Chris Ricker
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Ceri Davies wrote: > I wonder if by "stable" you actually mean "unmaintained"? Sunfreeware > is certainly not the originating community for logrotate, that's just > somewhere the source file exists. As Sun's role is to "monitor the open > source project", do they even know wh

logrotate [LSARC/2008/359 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread James Carlson
Sebastien Roy writes: > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:08 -0700, Dean Roehrich wrote: > > 1. Background > > > > Logrotate rotates log files and archives them in a central location. > > I find it odd that this case doesn't make mention of logadm(1M), the > existing piece of architecture already in t

removal of kadm5.keytab [PSARC/2008/358 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Mark Phalan
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 09:49 -0400, James Carlson wrote: > Mark Phalan writes: > > > > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 09:28 -0400, James Carlson wrote: > > > Wyllys Ingersoll writes: > > > > With the latest resync of Kerberos with MIT Kerberos 1.6.3 (in > > > > progress) kadmind(1M) reads the keys it needs

logrotate [LSARC/2008/359 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Sebastien Roy
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 13:08 -0700, Dean Roehrich wrote: > 1. Background > > Logrotate rotates log files and archives them in a central location. I find it odd that this case doesn't make mention of logadm(1M), the existing piece of architecture already in the OS which is nearly identical to

pen load balancer [PSARC/2008/339 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Darren J Moffat
Jia Ni wrote: >> My understanding from the above reference is that the pen program >> itself does NOT read the /etc/pen.cf file by default (it does take -f >> argument). In this case I highly recommend that the pen >> configuration be via SMF properties able to be set per instance of >> svc:/

Git [LSARC/2008/360 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Mark A. Carlson
I am sponsoring this case for Enrique Lopez-Pineda. It requests a Minor binding and times out next Tuesday. This is a Familiarity (key word) case and thus the FOSS checklist is in the case materials directory along with the Man pages. The upstream community is here: http://git.or.cz/ -- mark Te

logrotate [LSARC/2008/359 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Randy Fishel
On Tue, 3 Jun 2008, Mark A. Carlson wrote: > The "we already have X" argument does not apply to > familiarity projects such as this one. If the Linux > developer/admin doesn't find his favorite tool, he > moves on... > > -- mark It would apply if the tool in question conflicted with an existi

removal of kadm5.keytab [PSARC/2008/358 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Mark Phalan
On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 09:28 -0400, James Carlson wrote: > Wyllys Ingersoll writes: > > With the latest resync of Kerberos with MIT Kerberos 1.6.3 (in > > progress) kadmind(1M) reads the keys it needs directly from the > > Kerberos database. Prior to this a keytab file had to be populated > > with

[Fwd: Re: Switch SPARC GNU coreutils+bash from 32 to 64bit PSARC 2008/351

2008-06-03 Thread Darren J Moffat
Richard L. Hamilton wrote: >> - Stack would be non-executable by default > An advantage, certainly, although if someone is paranoid (and has no > self-modifying code that would choke on it), this can be done for 32-bit with > an /etc/system setting. The ON consolidation, and some others, already e

Git [LSARC/2008/360 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Mark A. Carlson wrote: > I am sponsoring this case for Enrique Lopez-Pineda. It requests > a Minor binding and times out next Tuesday. Thank you! Every X developer at Sun who has to use git to get code from X.Org owes you whatever your favorite beverage is. >Exported interface

logrotate [LSARC/2008/359 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Mark A. Carlson
s Sun's role is to "monitor the open > source project", do they even know where it is? The logrotate utility > doesn't appear to have a "homepage" on the world wide web, being > maintained in Red Hat's CVS tree only so far as I can see [2]. > > Ceri > > [1] NMFN; see above. > [2] CVSROOT=:pserver:anonymous at rhlinux.redhat.com:/usr/local/CVS > > -- next part -- An HTML attachment was scrubbed... URL: <http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20080603/fff82451/attachment.html>

logrotate [LSARC/2008/359 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Dean Roehrich
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:08:19PM -0700, Dean Roehrich wrote: > > Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.66 04/17/08 SMI > This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems > 1. Introduction > 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: >logrotate > 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:

logrotate [LSARC/2008/359 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 01:08:19PM -0700, Dean Roehrich wrote: > /usr/share/man/man8/logrotate.8 Uncommitted Man page Nit: there's no manpage section 8 in Solaris. I think you want 1M here.

[Fwd: Re: Switch SPARC GNU coreutils+bash from 32 to 64bit [PSARC/2008/351]

2008-06-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
James Carlson wrote: > > FYI, enable_extended_FILE_stdio(3C) is incompatible to many > > applications, including coreutil. Using a FD > 256 crashes such > > applications. > > "Coreutil"? As in GNU coreutils? > > If there's a problem here, and it's not just broken code in the > application, then

Switch SPARC GNU coreutils+bash from 32 to 64bit [PSARC/2008/351 Self Review]

2008-06-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
"Garrett D'Amore" wrote: > (As far as "something better", I think I prefer something along the > lines of how AFS handles it, where $VARIABLE could be used within a > symbolic link -- the kernel expands the variable when following the > symlink. But we shouldn't try to design the solution he

[Fwd: Re: Switch SPARC GNU coreutils+bash from 32 to 64bit [PSARC/2008/351]

2008-06-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
"I. Szczesniak" wrote: > > It's also lifted if you call enable_extended_FILE_stdio(3C), use the > > extendedFILE.so.1 preload, or 'F' is used as the last character in the > > fopen(3C) mode string. > > FYI, enable_extended_FILE_stdio(3C) is incompatible to many > applications, including coreuti

Switch SPARC GNU coreutils+bash from 32 to 64bit [PSARC/2008/351 Self Review]

2008-06-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
Bart Smaalders wrote: > x86 will for now need to deliver both 32 and 64 bit binaries. If you're > worried > about the performance issues involved w/ isaexec, then let's design > something If we start talking about isaexec, we should also talk about pfexec. I would like to see the code moved

GnuTLS Update [LSARC/2008/341 FastTrack timeout 06/03/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Irene Huang
Closing this case as approved. --Irene Irene Huang wrote: > Hi, all > > If there's any issues with this case, please reply with an email. If > not, I am closing this case tomorrow as approved. > > Thanks > > --Irene > On Thu, 2008-05-29 at 15:55 +0800, Jeff Cai wrote: > >> On Wed, 2008-05-28

logrotate [LSARC/2008/359 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Octave Orgeron
Hmm... we already have logadm to rotate logs in Solaris today. Logcheck would be more interesting. We don't have a built-in utility to scan logs for issues. I have a pkg'd version of logcheck, if anyone is interested. *-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-*-* Octave J. Orgeron Solaris

PSARC/2008/335 - Corrections for Committed API for packet interception

2008-06-03 Thread Darren Reed
Was approved at last week's PSARC meeting. Darren

logrotate [LSARC/2008/359 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Dean Roehrich
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.66 04/17/08 SMI This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems 1. Introduction 1.1. Project/Component Working Name: logrotate 1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: Author: Colin Ngam 1.3 Date of This Document: 03 Ju

Switch SPARC GNU coreutils+bash from 32 to 64bit [PSARC/2008/351 Self Review]

2008-06-03 Thread Joerg Schilling
Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Joseph Kowalski wrote: > > I don't see why /usr/gnu/bin/awk should get preference over /usr/bin/awk > > just because its in gnucore. > > How about because it's already known to be 64-bit clean since the GNU > utilities run on platforms that are 64-bit only, while the Sol

Switch SPARC GNU coreutils+bash from 32 to 64bit [PSARC/2008/351 Self Review]

2008-06-03 Thread Scott Rotondo
Joerg Schilling wrote: > If we start talking about isaexec, we should also talk about pfexec. I would > like to see the code moved into the kernel. Other possible ways of getting > rid > of a userspace implementation for the pfexec features would be to implement > something like capabilities th

SAM-QFS Support for Solaris Zones [PSARC/2008/347 FastTrack timeout 06/04/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Dean Roehrich
The status of this case has been changed to 'waiting need spec'. Dean

Full case ? / was: Re: Switch SPARC GNU coreutils+bash from 32 to 64bit [PSARC/2008/351Self Review]

2008-06-03 Thread Darren J Moffat
To make it clear on the record since it obviously wasn't to many people given the slight incorrect language I used. I do not believe this case qualified for self review or automatic approval. Please submit a proposal and start a fast-track timer. -- Darren J Moffat

removal of kadm5.keytab [PSARC/2008/358 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread James Carlson
Mark Phalan writes: > > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 09:49 -0400, James Carlson wrote: > > OK. Perhaps the file should be deleted on system upgrade, so that the > > user doesn't try to do something silly, like modify the file and > > expect it to do something. > > That might be a good idea (although lo

[kerberos-discuss] removal of kadm5.keytab [PSARC/2008/358 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 10:58:29AM -0400, James Carlson wrote: > I guess I was thinking more about what happens when things are > restored from backup; the key will always be the one in the db, even > if a different one is (somehow) given elsewhere. Perhaps that just > doesn't happen in practice .

removal of kadm5.keytab [PSARC/2008/358 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread James Carlson
Mark Phalan writes: > > On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 09:28 -0400, James Carlson wrote: > > Wyllys Ingersoll writes: > > > With the latest resync of Kerberos with MIT Kerberos 1.6.3 (in > > > progress) kadmind(1M) reads the keys it needs directly from the > > > Kerberos database. Prior to this a keytab fi

ejabberd instant messaging server [PSARC/2008/340 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Jim Walker
Nicolas Williams wrote: > > Does ejabberd use OpenSSL? > Yes. Raymond has an approved OpenSSL contract for ejabberd. There should be a contract-19 doc here for ejabberd. There's a space for it: http://sac.eng.sun.com/Archives/CaseLog/arc/PSARC/2003/500/contracts/ Raymond, John, Can you update

ejabberd instant messaging server [PSARC/2008/340 FastTrack timeout 05/29/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 07:57:06PM +0800, Raymond Xiong wrote: > ejabberd supports SASL(actually it always uses SASL so that client > that doesn't support SASL cannot connect to it), but unfortunately > it only suports very limited mechanisms: digest-md5, plain, and > anonymous. That's fine. S

removal of kadm5.keytab [PSARC/2008/358 FastTrack timeout 06/10/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread James Carlson
Wyllys Ingersoll writes: > With the latest resync of Kerberos with MIT Kerberos 1.6.3 (in > progress) kadmind(1M) reads the keys it needs directly from the > Kerberos database. Prior to this a keytab file had to be populated > with the keys kadmind required. By default this file was located at > /e

SAM-QFS Support for Solaris Zones [PSARC/2008/347 FastTrack timeout 06/04/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Dean Roehrich
On Tue, Jun 03, 2008 at 12:21:27AM -0700, Dan Price wrote: > If you need a hook in the zones framework, then let's figure out how > to provide you one, rather than hacking something onto the side. > Please come talk to the zones team before proceeding with this work, > via zones-core at sun.com, or

[Fwd: Re: Switch SPARC GNU coreutils+bash from 32 to

2008-06-03 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
> > I can think of three main categories of capacity > limits on 32-bit that might > > be higher on 64-bit: > > * file size max of 2GB > > * register size and usage > > * available address space, and therefore amount > that can be mmap()'d at once > > (Also, IIRC stdio is supposed to handle > 256 f

SAM-QFS Support for Solaris Zones [PSARC/2008/347 FastTrack timeout 06/04/2008]

2008-06-03 Thread Dan Price
On Wed 28 May 2008 at 02:54PM, Dean Roehrich wrote: > All SAM-QFS packages will be updated with the following attributes and > settings, to allow installs into the global zone and to prevent the > install from propagating into non-global zones and prevent the package > from