I believe we can remove the two items from the list of interfaces
easily... Less interfaces, less sustaining... :-)
Petr
Danek Duvall wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:18:49AM -0500, Brian Utterback wrote:
>
>
>> I think that this is documenting the location, rather than the contents of
>>
On Thu, Dec 18, 2008 at 10:35:36AM +1000, James C. McPherson wrote:
> You seem to be conflicting with
>
> 6674032 Introduce GCC 4.3.x in Nevada
> 6674042 Introduce MPFR (Multiple Precision Floating-Point Rounding Library)
> in Nevada
> 6674044 Introduce GNU MP 4.2.4 in Nevada
There's als
You had several issues recorded in the 'issues' file for this case,
but you weren't present for the inception review to discuss them. I
read through the issues and responded as best I could to each, and we
discussed them at some length during the meeting.
I'd like to close this loop to make sure
Template Version: @(#)onepager.txt 1.35 07/11/07 SMI
Copyright 2007 Sun Microsystems
Sun Proprietary/Confidential: Internal Use Only: Engineering Need-to-Know
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name: GNU Developer Collection
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier: George Vasick
Nicolas Droux writes:
> Here are my issues for Solaris Bridging (PSARC 2008/055).
> Unfortunately I have a conflict and won't be able to attend the
> inception review, but I'll be happy to follow-up by email.
I'll integrate these (and my replies) into the existing issues file.
> ngd-01 bridgi
On Dec 17, 2008, at 2:00 PM, James Carlson wrote:
> Nicolas Droux writes:
>> Here are my issues for Solaris Bridging (PSARC 2008/055).
>> Unfortunately I have a conflict and won't be able to attend the
>> inception review, but I'll be happy to follow-up by email.
>
> I'll integrate these (and my
In process of integrating this case, the project team has had to modify
the interface.
If anyone wants me to restart a timer on this, let me know.
-- mark
The changes include:
1) The project needs to touch /etc/security/prof_attr and
/etc/security/exec_attr, so they have divided the package in
I'm sponsoring this case for myself, timing out 12/23.
The requested release binding is minor.
The IPQoS ipgpc (IP generic packet classifier) module defines a number of
selectors that can be used to classify packets. Among those selectors is
"if_groupname", which selects all packets associ
December 23, 2008 -- No Meeting
WEDNESDAY December 24, 2008 -- No Meeting
-- next part --
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20081217/84bc2944/attachment.html>
This case was approved at today's PSARC meeting.
I've updated the IAM file to reflect the approval.
Thanks all,
Rich
On 12/11/08 16:24, Rich.Brown at Sun.COM wrote:
> I'm sponsoring this case for Pavel Filipensky to add the '-Z' option to
> umountall(1M). This case times out on 12/18/
Hello LSARC reviewers!
I need to close this LSARC case (we have agreement on package structure).
I suppose that foss checklist needs to be updated:
http://sac.eng.sun.com/Archives/CaseLog/arc/LSARC/2008/642/fosslist.txt
The new version of section 4.0 is below:
4.0 Interfaces
(see http://www.
This case was approved at today's PSARC meeting.
I've updated the IAM file.
Cheers,
Jim
This case was approved at today's PSARC meeting.
I've updated the IAM file.
Cheers,
Jim
I agree with Rich on the avoidance of an "undocumented" parameter, unless
absolutely necessary.
+1
Rich Brown wrote:
> On 12/12/08 06:23, Pavel Filipensky wrote:
>> Hi Brian,
>>
>> On 12/12/08 11:19, Brian Ruthven - Sun UK wrote:
>>>
>>> Is it ever likely to be useful to do "umountall -Z zonename
The specifications (fcoe_initiator_func_spec_v100.pdf section 1, for
example)
note that only networks meeting a criteria list are capable of FCoe. Is
there any
observability as to whether a network is capable? Or indication of what
is missing?
Provided by this project or outside of this project?
This case was approved in PSARC today.
-- mark
This case was approved in PSARC today.
-- mark
Here are my issues for Solaris Bridging (PSARC 2008/055).
Unfortunately I have a conflict and won't be able to attend the
inception review, but I'll be happy to follow-up by email.
ngd-01 bridging-spec.txt states "The links assigned to a bridge must
not themselves be VLANs, VNICs, or tunnels
chenpu wrote:
> Hi Evan,
>
> Beside the search function, Command Assistant Client App also provides
> some other features, for example "clip board". User can save their
> desired contents into "clip board" and write comments on them, and then
> those contents can be reviewed off-line anytime.
>
I think that this is documenting the location, rather than the
contents of these directories.
Danek Duvall wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:09:33PM +0100, Petr Slechta wrote:
>
>>/usr/share/doc/findbugs uncommitted documentation and
>> license
>
> Documentation isn't an in
JBeck> I am sponsoring this fast-track for Ceri Davies. As indicated below,
JBeck> the interfaces are a combination of Committed and Project Private and
JBeck> the requested release binding is Minor. Because it is already late on
JBeck> Tuesday, I am setting the timer for a week from tomorrow: 20
This case was approved at the 12/17/2008 PSARC meeting.
So I am marking it closed approved.
-ted
--
Ted H. Kim
Sun Microsystems, Inc. ted.kim at sun.com
222 North Sepulveda Blvd., 10th Floor (310) 341-1116
El Segundo, CA 90245 (310) 341-1120 FAX
Hi James,
this tool is not a replacement for "man", being able to show a man page
is just a secondary feature.
The main feature is to show examples of command usage that are embedded
in Sun's documentation. That is, it extracts and shows you actual use
cases of a given commandline program, not
I have update the case directory with the changes to the foss
checklist. I have reset the timer to this Friday, since the only issue
was where to install the files and what to name them, which now is
resolved. I think til Friday should give everyone a chance to review
the changes. If any one di
Jim Walker writes:
> /usr/xpg4/bin/shSUNWxcu4
>
>
> BTW. Anyone know the classification for SUNWxcu4?
It's "Committed". It's set by a standard. (Depending on that seems a
little odd to me, when ksh93 or regular old ksh ought to do, but I
suppose it's up
chenpu writes:
> You are right, it will be better to show gnu related documents if user's
> MANPATH is set to /usr/gnu/share/man. We will implement this feature in
> client app.
The current /usr/bin/man command has better functionality than that:
the user doesn't even have to set the MANPATH var
chenpu wrote:
> Evan Yan ??:
>> chenpu wrote:
>>
>>> Hi Evan,
>>>
>>> Beside the search function, Command Assistant Client App also
>>> provides some other features, for example "clip board". User can save
>>> their desired contents into "clip board" and write comments on them,
>>> and then th
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 10:18:49AM -0500, Brian Utterback wrote:
> I think that this is documenting the location, rather than the contents of
> these directories.
Projects document exported (and imported) interfaces. Exported interfaces
are exported because the project team expects them to be i
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 12:09:33PM +0100, Petr Slechta wrote:
>/usr/share/doc/findbugs uncommitted documentation and license
Documentation isn't an interface, so this shouldn't be in the interface
table.
>/usr/share/lib/java/findbugs uncommitted findbugs' private
I. Szczesniak wrote:
> FYI: The upstream authors confirmed that the scripts work with any
> POSIX-conforming shell. No explicit bash syntax is used.
>
> IMO from a PSARC pov its not a matter of which shell is better, its a
> matter of which shell interface is being imported and that's certainly
>
30 matches
Mail list logo
