01/07/2009]
In-Reply-To: <499B52B3.2050301 at sun.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
(sorry, using the forum so LSARC-ext is probably not in Cc:)
> usr/bin/gcc-4.3.2=./i386-pc-solaris2.11-gcc-4.3.2
> usr/bin/i386-pc-solaris2.11-g
Sebastien Roy wrote:
>> 2.2 Release binding
>> What is is the release binding?
>> (see
>> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/release-taxonomy/)
>> [ ] Major
>> [*] Minor
>> [ ] Patch or Micro
>> [ ] Unknown -- ARC review required
>
> Why is the
Gary Winiger wrote:
>> There are other programs that call uadmin. I've written one myself
>> while I was working at a customer site ages ago.
>>
>> We need either in-kernel or libc interposer support... or significantly
>> improved documentation (and possibly a reclassification of uadmin(2)'s
> There are other programs that call uadmin. I've written one myself
> while I was working at a customer site ages ago.
>
> We need either in-kernel or libc interposer support... or significantly
> improved documentation (and possibly a reclassification of uadmin(2)'s
> stability level if we
In offline communication with James.Carlson at Sun.COM we have
closed on this proposal. There was no changes to the interfaces
proposed, but the spec has undergone substantial change. In
the same offline communication, Jim has agreed to a +1
(contingent on a revised).
The updated spec is availabl
I am sponsoring the following fasttrack for myself. Micro/patch binding
is requested. I believe the case qualifies for self review (since all
the interfaces are Consolidation Private) and have filed it as Closed
Approved Automatic. If there is a request, I'd be happy to convert it
to a fasttrack a
Gary Winiger wrote:
>> I'm kind of concerned here -- if there is a requirement for software to
>> do something else, then this needs to be fully documented -- including
>> in the man pages.
>>
>
> I've tried to get the folks, if there are any, who own uadmin(2)
> to update the ma
> I forgot to note that there is a proposed man page in the case
> directory. This text starts to touch on documenting the RBAC usage.
> I expect that the paragraph in question can be improved with a little
> help from Gary before it is integrated (but that can be done offline).
I j
On Tue, 17 Feb 2009, Gary Winiger wrote:
> > I am sponsoring this fasttrack on behalf of myself. It provides the
> > replacement CLI tool for the EOF'd CDE sys-suspend command. The
> > timeout is 2/23/09.
>
> +1 with a couple nits (below)
>
> > /usr/bin/sys-suspend will also use the power man
> > I don't believe it is reasonable to expect 3rd party callers of
> > documented system calls to know about undocumented requirements.
>
> Do you have some suggestions? I could file a P2 man page
> bug saying this man page is horribly out of date and I don't
> know how to fix
> I am sponsoring this fasttrack on behalf of myself. It provides the
> replacement CLI tool for the EOF'd CDE sys-suspend command. The
> timeout is 2/23/09.
+1 with a couple nits (below)
> /usr/bin/sys-suspend will also use the power management 'suspend'
> authorizations defined in PSARC/2008/
-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: proposal.txt
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090217/92458d6d/attachment.txt>
> There is a longer-term project to provide a library for users to
> consume, and not call uadmin(2) directly (in fact, we want to
> discourage this practice, as it doesn't properly audit).
It's worse than not properly auditing the use, it's that the
audit subsystem is adversel
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 13:47 -0800, James Walker wrote:
> 2.2 Release binding
> What is is the release binding?
> (see http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/policies/release-taxonomy/)
> [ ] Major
> [*] Minor
> [ ] Patch or Micro
> [ ] Unknown -- ARC review r
On Tue, 2009-02-17 at 13:18 -0800, James Walker wrote:
> I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Grace Tang. The requested
> release binding is minor. The man pages have been posted in the
> materials directory.
+1
-Seb
> I'm kind of concerned here -- if there is a requirement for software to
> do something else, then this needs to be fully documented -- including
> in the man pages.
I've tried to get the folks, if there are any, who own uadmin(2)
to update the man page to actually describe what
Gary Winiger wrote:
>> Is there any desire to provide consistent input/output for this to be
>> used in scripting? (Or are we simply going to expect application
>> consumers to call uadmin(2) directly?)
>>
>
> I've not read the current proposal, but as I believe Randy
> does kno
There is a longer-term project to provide a library for users to
consume, and not call uadmin(2) directly (in fact, we want to
discourage this practice, as it doesn't properly audit).
As the library is a bit more complex, and there is immediate need
for a (simple) cli, this wraps the equi
> Is there any desire to provide consistent input/output for this to be
> used in scripting? (Or are we simply going to expect application
> consumers to call uadmin(2) directly?)
I've not read the current proposal, but as I believe Randy
does know: ALL callers of uadmin(2) MUST
+1.
Is there any desire to provide consistent input/output for this to be
used in scripting? (Or are we simply going to expect application
consumers to call uadmin(2) directly?)
--Garrett
Randy Fishel wrote:
> I am sponsoring this fasttrack on behalf of myself. It provides the
> replacem
+1. It seems like cases of this nature (zero overlap with existing
Solaris, no architectural impact, concern) could qualify for self-review.
-- Garrett
James Walker wrote:
> I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Grace Tang. The requested
> release binding is minor. The man pages have bee
,
George
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: onepager-rev1.txt
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090217/fcb998e2/attachment.txt>
-- next part --
An embedded and c
I am sponsoring this fasttrack on behalf of myself. It provides the
replacement CLI tool for the EOF'd CDE sys-suspend command. The
timeout is 2/23/09.
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase %I% %G% SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component
I am sponsoring this fasttrack for Peter Cudhea. Requested binding is
Patch, timeout is 02/25/2009. There is an IO controller profile
attributes table, described in section 4.2.3, in the case materials
directory.
- John
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1
This case is now pending for the issue Mike brought up in this mail. So
I will mark it as 'waiting need spec' temporarily. Later when the
project team has a solution for this issue, I will reopen this case as a
fast track and set the timer.
-Frank
Mike Oliver wrote:
> Frank Che wrote:
>> I'm s
I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Karol Li. The requested
release binding is minor. The man page has been posted in the
materials directory.
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase %I% %G% SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working
I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Grace Tang. The requested
release binding is minor. The man pages have been posted in the
materials directory.
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase %I% %G% SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Work
I'm sponsoring this case for John Gu. The requested release binding is minor.
The man pages have been posted in the materials directory.
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase %I% %G% SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
Dan Price wrote:
>
> I'm pleased to sponsor the following fast-track for Chad Mynhier.
> Chad is enhancing some of the various "stat" commands to support
> a time stamp option in keeping with a similar option provided by
> iostat(1m). This case also defines a uniform specification for
> this opt
Hey Vivek,
Which SVR4 package is the jettison_1.0.jar file included in?
Thanks
Margot
Vivek Titarmare wrote:
> Hi John / Margot,
>
> As mentioned in the FOSS check list the interfaces are included in
> "jettison_1.0.jar" file.
>
>
>> Is this being delivered in its own package, and if so, ca
30 matches
Mail list logo
