Uncommitted requires
>>
> slurm
>
>> pdsh-mod-dshgroup Uncommitted None
>> pdsh-mod-netgroup Uncommitted None
>>
>>
>> Imported interfaceClassification Comments
>>=== ==
>>
> ===
>
>> None
>>
>>The binary file would go in "usr/local/bin"
>>
>>
>> 6. Resources and Schedule
>> 6.4. Steering Committee requested information
>> 6.4.1. Consolidation C-team Name:
>> SFW
>> 6.5. ARC review type: FastTrack
>> 6.6. ARC Exposure: open
>>
>> ___
>> opensolaris-arc mailing list
>> opensolaris-arc at opensolaris.org
>>
>>
>
>
>
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: FastTrack_pdsh.txt
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090421/51585d6a/attachment.txt>
I know that the JavaFX team needs GStreamer 0.10 supported on Solaris
10. GStreamer 0.10 depends on GLib 2.12 or newer. Do we plan to
integrate GLib 2.12 or newer as a part of the Firefox update? Could
you provide more specific information about what exact versions of
the dependencies you inten
Jason King wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Glenn Skinner
> wrote:
>
>>Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:38:07 +0100
>>From: Darren J Moffat
>>Subject: Re: PSARC 2009/228 ls enhancements
>>
>>Jason King wrote:
>>> --sort=WORD sort
No, that's not a typo. That case is apparently in the DB but does not
have a case directory. I have absolutely no idea how to update it.
Glenn Skinner wrote:
> Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Brian Utterback
> Subject: Upgrade NTP to Version 4 [PSARC/2009/244 Fast
John Fischer wrote:
> Mark,
>
> This will not go into a repo. It will only be included with an Update
> release of Solaris which is why the project is requesting a Patch
> release.
>
> Whether something goes into Open Solaris or Solaris (even in a Solaris
> Update) is irrelevant when making a case
John Fischer wrote:
> All,
>
> I am sponsoring this fast track for Partha Susarla from Sustaining in
> India. The case directory contains this proposal in the form of the
> 1-pager. The timer is set for April 28th, 2009.
>
> This project proposes to back port Firefox 3.0.x from Nevada to a
> Sola
me other project?
--
James Carlson, Solaris Networking
Sun Microsystems / 35 Network Drive71.232W Vox +1 781 442 2084
MS UBUR02-212 / Burlington MA 01803-2757 42.496N Fax +1 781 442 1677
-- next part --
An embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: Fasttrack_tips.txt
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090421/a9be6f4d/attachment.txt>
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 4:45 PM, Glenn Skinner wrote:
> ? ?Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:38:07 +0100
> ? ?From: Darren J Moffat
> ? ?Subject: Re: PSARC 2009/228 ls enhancements
>
> ? ?Jason King wrote:
> ? ?> --sort=WORD ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? ? sort by:
> ? ?> extension, none, size,
Hi Margot,
Pl. see my comments INLINE.
Let me know if you require more information on the same.
Thanks,
~Vivek R. Titarmare
-Original Message-
From: Margot Miller [mailto:margot.mil...@sun.com]
Sent: Thursday, April 16, 2009 4:50 AM
To: Mark Carlson
Cc: LSARC-ext at sun.com; Vivek.Ti
>This can be circumvent by using mmap(). Mandrake had such a patch
>which removed the memory limitation.
>
>IMO there is no reason why pbzip2 can't replace bzip2.
Only if it works; apparently in the code as it is, there is such a defect,
correct? (It will not bunzip files larger than fits in t
Alan,
I totally missed the /opt/firefox and /opt/sfw issue. Thanks for
catching that one.
I'll let the project team address these issues.
Thanks,
John
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> John Fischer wrote:
>> This project proposes to back port Firefox 3.0.x from Nevada to a
>> Solaris 10 Update relea
Mark,
This will not go into a repo. It will only be included with an Update
release of Solaris which is why the project is requesting a Patch
release.
Whether something goes into Open Solaris or Solaris (even in a Solaris
Update) is irrelevant when making a case open or closed. There is
nothing
As pbzip2 compiles and works with Sun Studio, it will be delivered
through that.
Runtime dependencies are satisfied through regular package dependency
mechanisms
On 21-Apr-09, at 12:38 PM, Glenn Skinner wrote:
>Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:25:51 -0700
>From: Rich Burridge
>Subject
On 4/20/09, Peter Tribble wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:39 PM, John Levon wrote:
> > On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:25:51AM -0700, Rich Burridge wrote:
> >
> >> bzip2 is a free and open source block sorting lossless data
> >> compression algorithm with comparatively high compress
As the case is specified it gets my +1.
On 4/21/09, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems
wrote:
>
> I'm filing this case on behalf of Roland Mainz and the ksh93 integration
> project. I believe that the case qualifies for self-review, as it has
> no external interfaces apart from introducing a
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On re-review that seems reasonable. What happens if a user's ntp.conf
> uses removed keywords? Will the service end up in maintenance mode? Or
> will there be but a warning in the service log file (and/or syslog)?
In all cases the ntpd will complain about the invali
As the case is specified it gets my +1 but I still have some minor questions:
On 4/21/09, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems
wrote:
>
> I'm sponsoring this fast-track request on behalf of Roland Mainz and the
> ksh93-integration project. It consists of more commands being converted
> to use i
John Fischer wrote:
> This project proposes to back port Firefox 3.0.x from Nevada to a
> Solaris 10 Update release which is a Patch release of Solaris.
Is it integrating into the update release or shipping as a separate
web download running on top of the update release? (/opt would be
wrong f
embedded and charset-unspecified text was scrubbed...
Name: proposal.txt
URL:
<http://mail.opensolaris.org/pipermail/opensolaris-arc/attachments/20090421/fe5cded4/attachment.txt>
Date: Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:38:07 +0100
From: Darren J Moffat
Subject: Re: PSARC 2009/228 ls enhancements
Jason King wrote:
> --sort=WORD sort by:
> extension, none, size, time, version, status, time, atime, access, use
> --time=
> Project Description:
> PCITool was previously conceived in PSARC 2005/232, but was
> intended as an internal only tool. This case would make the
> command line interface, pcitool, available to external customers.
My recollection from 2005/232 was there was a discussion
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:19:00 -0700 (PDT)
From: Brian Utterback
Subject: Upgrade NTP to Version 4 [PSARC/2009/244 FastTrack
timeout 04/23/2009]
...
This project supercedes PSARC 2001/162, which should considered
withdrawn.
I went looking for this case and co
+1
-- mark
John Forte wrote:
> I am sponsoring the following fasttrack for myself. Requested binding is
> minor. Timeout is set for 4/29.
>
> - John
>
> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
> This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
> 1. Introduction
>1.1. Project/C
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:25:51 -0700
From: Rich Burridge
Subject: pbzip2 [PSARC/2009/247 FastTrack timeout 04/27/2009]
I'm sponsoring this case for John Sonnenschein. The requested
release binding is minor. The man page has been posted in the
materials directory.
...
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 17, 2009 at 02:48:43PM -0400, Brian Utterback wrote:
>> Nicolas Williams wrote:
>>> you
>>> mentioned some incompatible changes. Can you list them all?
>> To answer this, please find enclosed a list of all the
>> incompatibilities I know of.
>
> How is u
On Mon, 20 Apr 2009 22:09:58 -0400
Torrey McMahon wrote:
> Is mpt_sas going to replace mpt? Or could both drivers be loaded at the
> same time?
Both drivers can be loaded at the same time. mpt(7d) supports
Parallel SCSI and SAS generation 1 only.
mpt_sas(7d) does not support Parallel SCSI or
FreeIPMI [LSARC/2009/245 FastTrack] timeout extended one week to
05/01/2009 to allow review in PSARC.
I have extended the timer on this case until Thursday 4/23/2009 to further
resolve in-process issues.
-- mark
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE COUNCIL
Layered Software ARC
-
04-21-2009 MEETING MINUTES
Send CORRECTIONS, additions, deletions to lsarc-coord at sun.com.
ATTENDEES:
Chair
I have extended the timer on this case until Thursday 4/23/2009 to further
resolve in-process issues.
-- mark
This case was approved at LSARC today. The IAM file has been updated.
-- mark
This case was approved at LSARC today. The IAM file has been updated.
-- mark
I am sponsoring the following fasttrack for myself. Requested binding is
minor. Timeout is set for 4/29.
- John
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
libstmf/stmfad
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 12:16:02PM -0400, Brian Utterback wrote:
> >How is upgrade handled? Are old configs re-written to the new style on
> >service start?
>
> No. Because of the fact that the ntp.conf file is almost completely
> backwards compatible, we will not attempt to re-write the files.
Peter Tribble writes:
> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 6:39 PM, John Levon wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 20, 2009 at 09:25:51AM -0700, Rich Burridge wrote:
>>
>>> bzip2 is a free and open source block sorting lossless data
>>> compression algorithm with comparatively high compression efficiency.
>>
+1
Margot
John Fischer wrote:
> All,
>
> Attached is the updated man page for this case.
> I have put this in the case directory as well.
>
> Thanks,
>
> John
>
> John Fischer wrote:
>> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
>> This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
>>
Vivek Titarmare wrote:
> Exported Interfaces:
> Interface NameClassification Comments
> --- --
> ---
> SUNWtipc Uncommitted Package
> /usr/in
Jason King wrote:
> --sort=WORD sort by:
> extension, none, size, time, version, status, time, atime, access, use
> --time=WORD display WORD
> (atime, access, use, ctime, or status) for time, also used as sort key
Hey Vivek,
For the below:
Is this true? And what is qshell?
[VIVEK] No not really. Setuid is only require for ssh which is not the
default argument. Not a compulsory command in this case.
Is qshell being delivered as part of this case. If not, then there is no
setuid issue?
Please upda
You would have to ask those project teams directly. I have not
seen a response from them on this list.
-- mark
Danek Duvall wrote:
> Appserver, cacao, SCN, and netbeans use SAAJ, as well. Any plans to shift
> them to this common version?
>
> Danek
On Tue, Apr 21, 2009 at 08:39:43AM -0600, Mark A. Carlson wrote:
> You would have to ask those project teams directly. I have not
> seen a response from them on this list.
Presumably the project team you're sponsoring here is in communication with
them, since SAAJ is a common Java component, and
I. Szczesniak wrote:
> As the case is specified it gets my +1 but I still have some minor questions:
>
> On 4/21/09, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems
> wrote:
>
>> I'm sponsoring this fast-track request on behalf of Roland Mainz and the
>> ksh93-integration project. It consists of more com
All,
With Darren's issues with this case having been addressed within the
latest specification and the timer having expired I am closing this case
approved.
Thanks,
John
Darren J Moffat wrote:
> John Fischer wrote:
>> Darren,
>>
>> Have your issues be sufficiently addressed?
>
> Not really but
Hi Torrey,
mpt_sas(7D) and mpt(7D) are different drivers to support different
controllers.
mpt(7D) is to support LSI parallel SCSI and SAS1.x controllers.
mpt_sas(7D) is to support LSI SAS2.0 controllers.
The naming mpt_sas(7D) is because the driver is to support SAS
controllers regardless custom
Hi Garrett,
Actually the proposed project includes the modification of stmsboot(1M)
to support mpt_sas(7D), which is a utility to enable/disable mpxio for
PHCI drivers . I assume all PHCI drivers should do the modification, I
should have added a statement for stmsboot support in section 4.5.
A
45 matches
Mail list logo
