Having recieved a +1 and no objections, this case is now closed approved.
-alan-
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> I am sponsoring this fasttrack for Stuart Kreitman of the X team.
> It removes unmaintained programs for manipulating a font format
> that has been obsolete since the X11R5 release
Having recieved a +1 and no objections, this case is now closed approved.
-alan-
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> I am sponsoring this fasttrack for Stuart Kreitman of the X team.
> It removes an unmaintained client library for the XIE extension
> which is supported only in Xsun, not Xorg.
>
Having recieved a +1, no objections, and only one user shedding a tear,
this case is now closed approved.
-alan-
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> I am sponsoring this fasttrack for Stuart Kreitman of the X team.
> It removes an unmaintained Xaw frontend to the unshipped mh mail handler
> system.
Alan Coopersmith wrote:
> I am sponsoring this fasttrack for Stefan Teleman of the X team.
> The timer is set for next Tuesday, June 23, 2009.
Given the +1 and no strenuous objections, this case is now
closed approved.Further design discussion of a -2 protocol
rev should be taken to the X mail
James Carlson writes:
> Gordon Ross writes:
> > It appears that cachefs is the "odd man out" here.
> > I'd rather follow the precedent of autofs, nfs, zfs,
> > unless someone can point to rules to the contrary.
>
> Seems reasonable to me.
Agreed, although the rest seems not to be completely clea
James Walker wrote:
> I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Rich Reinhard. The requested
> release binding is minor. The man pages have been posted in the
> materials directory.
>
> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
> This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
> 1.
I'm sponsoring this familiarity case for Rich Reinhard. The requested
release binding is minor. The man pages have been posted in the
materials directory.
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Compo
Jim Walker wrote:
> Mark Martin wrote:
>
> 4.0 Interfaces
> 4.1 Exported Interfaces
> Interface NameClassificationComments
> ---
> ---
> SUNWsysbenchUncommitted
All comments for this case have been addressed and
the timeout has been reached.
I'm marking this case closed approved.
Cheers,
Jim
Gordon Ross writes:
> It appears that cachefs is the "odd man out" here.
> I'd rather follow the precedent of autofs, nfs, zfs,
> unless someone can point to rules to the contrary.
Seems reasonable to me.
--
James Carlson 42.703N 71.076W
> > The existing convention appears to be that "fs type" programs
> > such as mount, umount, go in /usr/lib/fs/$FSTYPE whereas
> > other FS support programs [go] in /usr/lib/$FSTYPE, such as
> > /usr/lib/nfs/{mountd,nfsmapid} etc.
> >
> > I just followed that convention.
>
> As Jim already comme
Can we have a +1, please?
This case was derailed and voted on 09 Jul 2008. The was a vote and the
majority voted to approve with one deny. Normally what happens is
that the minority voters provide opinion text. Due to extraordinary
circumstances this is not possible in this case. The effective text of
what would h
Mark Martin wrote:
4.0 Interfaces
4.1 Exported Interfaces
Interface NameClassificationComments
---
---
SUNWsysbenchUncommittedPackage
14 matches
Mail list logo
