On 22/07/2009 15:15, Wyllys Ingersoll wrote:
> Don Cragun wrote:
>> The one-pager for this project says (in section 3.6) that it doesn't
>> duplicate core Solaris components. But the description of the Pth
>> library provided by this case sure sounds like it is trying to duplicate
>> the behavior
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
WebKit 1.1.x
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
Author: Alfred Peng
1.3 Date of This Document:
2
Darren Kenny wrote:
...
>
> The main concern is that the code changes you make, must be published (which
> most code is right now) - a patch should be fine - and all the better if you
> could push that patch upstream to the GnuPG maintainers.
>
> What makes you think that modifying GPLv3 code is
Brian Cameron wrote:
> Imported Interfaces:
>
> Interface Stability Comments
>
>
>
> cURLObsolete Uncommitted PSARC/2007/165
CURL is U
Alfred Peng wrote:
> On 07/23/09 09:49 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
>> Brian Cameron wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Imported Interfaces:
>>>
>>> Interface Stability Comments
>>>
>>>
>>>
> Don Cragun wrote:
> > The one-pager for this project says (in section 3.6) that it doesn't
> > duplicate core Solaris components. But the description of the Pth
> > library provided by this case sure sounds like it is trying to duplicate
> > the behavior of the Solaris pthread library and major
Sebastien Roy wrote:
> The project team has supplied new materials for this case addressing
> issues brought up by Jim Carlson. I've thus reset the timer on this
> case. It expires on 07/29/2009.
>
> The changes include:
>
> 1. Make it clear that IFF_NOACCEPT is a per-ill flag.
> 2. Make it cle
Brian Cameron wrote:
> 4.8. Packaging & Delivery:
>
> The project will be delivering the following packages:
> SUNWwebkit
> SUNWwebkit-devel
What's the difference between the two packages if any?
Cheers,
Jim
BTW. You may want to update 1.4.4. OPG is not a BU
anymore.
Michael,
The first section is from the sac_nextcase script. The second one is
from the form that the project team filled out.
John
Michael Kearney wrote:
> Why is section 1 partially duplicated?
>
> Brian Cameron wrote:
>> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
>> This informatio
Jim,
The OSD (formerly JDS) group will have both a regular end user package
and a developer package. The developer package will typically contain
things relating to header files, package configuration scripts and
sometimes developer documentation. Other packages that you will see
with the OSD gr
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/announcements/
OpenSolaris ARC Agenda
TELECONFERENCE NUMBERS:
(866)545-5223 (Within US)
(215) 446-3661 (International)
ACCESS CODE 939-55-86
Times are US/Pacific Timezone
ARC meetings are recorded.
TUESDAY July 28, 2009
No meet
Brian Cameron wrote:
> The libcURL HTTP backend support has been removed from WebKit 1.1.x.
> The
> default HTTP backend is now libsoup. WebKit uses libsoup to verify the
> peer's certificates for HTTPS connections. Currently, WebKit accepts
> all
> SSL certificate
Gordon Ross wrote:
>> Don Cragun wrote:
>>
>>> The one-pager for this project says (in section 3.6) that it doesn't
>>> duplicate core Solaris components. But the description of the Pth
>>> library provided by this case sure sounds like it is trying to duplicate
>>> the behavior of the Solari
this is just a test of sac infrastructure... please ignore.
Is this something I should worry about?
test message for arc infrastructure... ignore this..
- Garrett
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/announcements/
OpenSolaris ARC Agenda
TELECONFERENCE NUMBERS:
(866)545-5223 (Within US)
(215) 446-3661 (International)
ACCESS CODE 939-55-86
Times are US/Pacific Timezone
ARC meetings are recorded.
TUESDAY July 28, 2009
No meet
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/announcements/
OpenSolaris ARC Agenda
TELECONFERENCE NUMBERS:
(866)545-5223 (Within US)
(215) 446-3661 (International)
ACCESS CODE 939-55-86
Times are US/Pacific Timezone
ARC meetings are recorded.
TUESDAY July 28, 2009
No meet
John Fischer wrote:
> Jim,
>
> The OSD (formerly JDS) group will have both a regular end user package
> and a developer package. The developer package will typically contain
> things relating to header files, package configuration scripts and
> sometimes developer documentation. Other packages t
On 07/23/09 09:49 PM, Stefan Teleman wrote:
> Brian Cameron wrote:
>
>
>> Imported Interfaces:
>>
>> Interface Stability Comments
>>
>>
>>
>> cURL
Not sure whether Meem is following up our discussion here. I will copy
him on this email and give a summary as below:
In the current VRRP design, once a VRRP router is enabled, we will hold
the underlying data-link and the VRRP router associated VNIC open, to
prevent them from being renamed/del
Jim,
Most of these I can not answer but I can answer the library version
question because I asked it prior to the fast track submission. I'll
let the project team answer the others and they can correct me if I
am wrong. Note, I am not part of this project just know enough about
it to answer some
On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:12:56 -0700 Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>Gordon Ross wrote:
>>> Don Cragun wrote:
>>>
The one-pager for this project says (in section 3.6) that it doesn't
duplicate core Solaris components. But the description of the Pth
library provided by this case sure sounds li
Don Cragun wrote:
> On Thu, 23 Jul 2009 11:12:56 -0700 Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>
>> Gordon Ross wrote:
>>
Don Cragun wrote:
> The one-pager for this project says (in section 3.6) that it doesn't
> duplicate core Solaris components. But the description of the
24 matches
Mail list logo
