Hi Sebastien,
Thanks for your review.
Sebastien Roy wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 13:44 +0900, Fuyuki Hasegawa - Sun Microsystems
wrote:
...
/usr/share/ibus/component Private engine specification file
/xkbc.xml
/usr/lib/ibus/ibus-engine-xkbc Private
Tavitayya Varanasi wrote:
Hi Darren,
Please look below for embedded answers.
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Why does this need a top level directory in /usr/ ? The only time we
should need those is when there is a hard requirement to be able to
support multiple incompatible versions
Naoyuki Ishimura wrote:
Hi Sebastien,
Thanks for your review.
Sebastien Roy wrote:
On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 13:44 +0900, Fuyuki Hasegawa - Sun Microsystems
wrote:
...
/usr/share/ibus/component Private engine
specification file
/xkbc.xml
On Thu, Dec 3, 2009 at 4:09 PM, Lloyd Chambers Lloyd.Chambers at sun.com
wrote:
I see APPROVE votes from:
- Ed Hunter
- Mark Carlson
- Michael Kearney
- Margot Miller
Waiting to hear from Mark Martin.
No other votes so far.
?Lloyd
Mark Martin votes to approve.
Hi All,
I need your advice :
I?m planning to migrate from windows clients OS to any Linux version, in our
organization :
Current Environment :
Solaris 10 server OS which have Oracle Ebs 10 web ? this will not change
Clients :
Windows XP . 200 , vista , can access oracle application
After discussions with the OpenSolaris architect and lead, I withdraw
this case. It was premature and will be considered as part of a bigger
project to provide Solaris moderization.
-JohnS
If you don't mind I put out my own case. We've planned something
similar since a year and already have the code completed.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:01 PM, John Sonnenschein
John.Sonnenschein at sun.com wrote:
After discussions with the OpenSolaris architect and lead, I withdraw
this case. It
That would kindof defeat the purpose of me withdrawing it, wouldn't it?
-JohnS
? wrote:
If you don't mind I put out my own case. We've planned something
similar since a year and already have the code completed.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 5:01 PM, John Sonnenschein
No, because the content, implementation and scope is different.
On Fri, Dec 4, 2009 at 8:44 PM, John Sonnenschein
johnsonnenschein at gmail.com wrote:
That would kindof defeat the purpose of me withdrawing it, wouldn't it?
-JohnS
? wrote:
If you don't mind I put out my own
(subject changed to end this thread in the case's mail log)
On Fri, 2009-12-04 at 21:03 +0100, ? wrote:
No, because the content, implementation and scope is different.
I would suggest working out the details of such a future case (including
deciding whether such a case should
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
EOF pcelx
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
Author: Garrett D'Amore
1.3 Date of This Document:
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
zfs receive -e
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
Author: Tom Erickson
1.3 Date of This Document:
12 matches
Mail list logo