Tim Haley wrote:
I am sponsoring the following fast-track for Paul Henson. This case
makes a minor modification to the behavior originally introduced
by PSARC/2008/659. That case introduced the 'passthrough-x' property
value for the zfs aclinherit property. Requested binding is
Garrett D'Amore gdamore at sun.com wrote:
We have several device that are live on pcmcia, and have a lot of
complexity introduced to them via this.
I strongly suspect there is even dead code, which we are keeping
around just because of Card Services API specifications. I hate dead
code.
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Garrett D'Amore gdamore at sun.com wrote:
We have several device that are live on pcmcia, and have a lot of
complexity introduced to them via this.
I strongly suspect there is even dead code, which we are keeping
around just because of Card Services API
On 01/ 8/10 10:07 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Garrett D'Amore gdamore at sun.com wrote:
We have several device that are live on pcmcia, and have a lot of
complexity introduced to them via this.
I strongly suspect there is even dead code, which we are keeping
around
I'm submitting this fasttrack for Sonam Gupta to update the existing ESP
Ghostscript with the latest GPL Ghostscript. The project is seeking patch
binding for implementation in S10. Timeout is 01/15/2010.
- Dan
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is
I am sponsoring this case for Jack Meng. It requests a patch
binding for iSCSI boot, updating PSARC 2008/427 as a result.
I do not expect this to be controversial so I have marked it
Self Review, but am happy to start a timer if an ARC member
so desires or significant discussion ensues.
-- mark
I am sponsoring this case for Bing Zhao. It requests a patch
binding for iSER, updating PSARC 2008/395 as a result.
I do not expect this to be controversial so I have marked it
Self Review, but am happy to start a timer if an ARC member
so desires or significant discussion ensues.
-- mark
Hi Mark and company.
How will the installer, and the customer, know that they can't use the
iSCSI boot device as dump device? How does that get squared away with
swap devices being the default dump device? Will dumpadm detect that the
system is using iSCSI and produce an error?
What rev of
