This case was approved during PSARC meeting 24-Mar-2010.
Pete
Just a note to update the spec of this case to include
64 bit versions of the libraries which were missed out
in the original proposal - I am leaving the case as closed
approved.
The relevant additions are:
usr/lib/64/libgdbm.so.3.0.0 Uncommitted library
usr/lib/64/libgdbm.so.3 Uncommitt
What is the interaction with intrd (PSARC/2004/199) here whose purpose
is to balance interrupts across CPU's ? Does the use of this tool imply
that the intrd service should be disabled (could they end up conflicting
with each other) ?
Thanks
pete
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>
> As the ARC tools seem
> But also to satisfy other requirements and time line, it'll also be an
> unbundled separate download via an SRU.
Just for the record here SRU == Support Repository Update which is the
vehicle for delivering fixes to the supported releases of OpenSolaris.
Pete
Gerard Henry wrote:
>> Note, that p7zip is also able to extract RAR files.
>> . However, since
>> the RAR format is rather popular and unrar
>> utility can be found in all
>> major Linux distribution it still makes sense
>> to have it ported to
>> OpenSolaris (it is not a common knowledge to
>
This case was approved during PSARC's open business 20-Feb-2008.
Thanks
Pete
I am sponsoring this FastTrack for Maxim Kartashev.
Mans pages are included in the case's materials directory.
Thanks
pete
1. Introduction
This project proposes to add the source code management (SCM)
system CVS[1] to the SFW consolidation for delivery on
OpenSolaris/Indiana. Since CVS
While this case had some discussion on the use of CVS this
has no apparent bearing on the case itself.
Therefore I am marking this case closed approved as the timeout
has now passed.
Thanks
pete
This case raised the following issues:
o integrating unzoo in isolation is architecturally
incomplete without the corresponding zoo command
which in itself allows for the extraction of files
from zoo archives.
o the little utility for having such a command.
o the command should be an O
James Carlson wrote:
> Venky wrote:
>> Sorry about the delay. Was a long weekend here.
>> Consolidating all queries below. Replies inline.
>
> Careful with the quoting; I didn't write half of what you've attributed
> to me. :-/
>
>> On Fri, Sep 25, 2009 at 01:15:42PM -0400, James Carlson wro
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Rainer Orth wrote:
>> Garrett D'Amore writes:
>>
>>
>>> Its "closed" meaning I didn't expect this to be controversial at
>>> all. Why do you believe that this case is controversial? (If you're
>>>
>>
>> *This* case isn't too controversial, although I happen to
I've marked this case as Closed Approved as the timer has
expired and +1's received.
Thanks
pete
This fast track was approved during the PSARC meeting on 16-Dec-2009.
Pete
Just some nits:
-d dir
- should this be -R instead to be consistent with
other commands that change files in a mounted
root disk (ie update_grub -R )
-v
- does this mean show what would happen but do
nothing or actually be verbose about what changes
This case was approved during the PSARC meeting on 19-Nov-2008.
Pete
Due to the various comments on this case I have set a timer for it:
23-May-2008.
The project team will be responding to the questions asked
(please keep manjula.pc at sun.com on the cc list).
Thanks
Pete
This case was approved during PSARC meeting of 22-Oct-2008.
I've reset the timer on this case to timeout on 5-Nov-2008
(the project owner is out until Monday 4 Nov).
Out standing items:
o the inclusion of the compatibility libraries, are they needed
because Solaris has the dbm libraries in any case ?
o the location of the include files - should they (
18 matches
Mail list logo
