On Thu, Nov 19, 2009 at 12:31:25PM -1000, Will Fiveash wrote:
> I have to agree with the analysis that supporting a "pkinit" module
> argument is very easy. Note that so far my implementation of pkinit
> support in our pam_krb5 is about 50 new lines of code. Taking the
> other approach of r
On Nov 19, 2009, at 4:29 AM, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Wyllys Ingersoll wrote:
>> Darren J Moffat wrote:
>>> Wyllys Ingersoll wrote:
Gary Winiger wrote:
> My personal recommendation: Develop a pam_pkinit (or similarly
> named) module
> with a separate man page. Have that ma
