Darren J Moffat schrieb:
> Roland Mainz wrote:
>> Joerg Schilling wrote:
>>> If ksh93 likes to provide commands that behave like the builtins, the
>>> only
>>> way I see is that ksh93 checks whether a specfic command needs special
>>> treatement and then calls /usr/bin/pfexec /usr/ast/bin/.
>>>
>
Joerg Barfurth wrote:
> A simpler fix that requires far more work would be to replace all the
> /usr/bin tools by AST-based equivalents, reconciling all the
> incompatibilities that may still exist on the way. Only then disabling
> the builtins actually works as it should.
For chmod that might
Joerg Barfurth wrote:
> One way to fix this would be to place the ksh93 versions of the builtins
> into the file system (e.g. as /usr/ast/bin/chmod) and have pfksh93
> pfexec that. Unfortunately that also requires all pertinent profiles to
> be updated to specify the /usr/ast/bin/* version as w
