EOF of plotting components [PSARC/2009/540 FastTrack timeout 10/21/2009]

2009-11-04 Thread Dan Mick
Gary Winiger wrote: >> Garrett asked me for codereview, and in looking, I've noticed that xterm >> still >> supports the crufty old Tek 4014 mode, and one can actually make it work >> with >> graph and plot (at least). So it's *conceivable* that someone is still >> using >> this, although it

EOF of plotting components [PSARC/2009/540 FastTrack timeout 10/21/2009]

2009-11-04 Thread Gary Winiger
> Garrett asked me for codereview, and in looking, I've noticed that xterm > still > supports the crufty old Tek 4014 mode, and one can actually make it work with > graph and plot (at least). So it's *conceivable* that someone is still using > this, although it would have to be nasty moldy old

EOF of plotting components [PSARC/2009/540 FastTrack timeout 10/21/2009]

2009-10-29 Thread Dan Mick
Garrett asked me for codereview, and in looking, I've noticed that xterm still supports the crufty old Tek 4014 mode, and one can actually make it work with graph and plot (at least). So it's *conceivable* that someone is still using this, although it would have to be nasty moldy old code, I'd

EOF of plotting components [PSARC/2009/540 FastTrack timeout 10/21/2009]

2009-10-27 Thread Garrett D'Amore
In the absence of feedback, I've decided that the best approach is to leave the functionality that is potentially still useful, and remove the functionality that is not. I'm doing this as an update to this case; I don't believe restarting the timer is necessary. Here's the actual changes: 1)

EOF of plotting components [PSARC/2009/540 FastTrack timeout 10/21/2009]

2009-10-21 Thread Garrett D'Amore
So, in the process of going about the work to remove these utilities, I found a few surprises. First off, it is possible to take "graph" output, and generate postscript, using the "postplot" utility (located in /usr/lib/lp/postscript). Second, it turns out that there are other postscript filt

EOF of plotting components [PSARC/2009/540 FastTrack timeout 10/21/2009]

2009-10-21 Thread Garrett D'Amore
Sebastien Roy wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 22:56 -0700, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems > wrote: > >> The following fast track (submitted on my own behalf) straddles (IMO) the >> boundary between a full-case and a fast track, primarily because of the >> impact it has on what are presumed to

EOF of plotting components [PSARC/2009/540 FastTrack timeout 10/21/2009]

2009-10-21 Thread Sebastien Roy
On Wed, 2009-10-07 at 22:56 -0700, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems wrote: > The following fast track (submitted on my own behalf) straddles (IMO) the > boundary between a full-case and a fast track, primarily because of the > impact it has on what are presumed to be Committed interfaces. > > It

EOF of plotting components [PSARC/2009/540 FastTrack timeout 10/21/2009]

2009-10-08 Thread Bart Smaalders
Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems wrote: > The following fast track (submitted on my own behalf) straddles (IMO) the > boundary between a full-case and a fast track, primarily because of the > impact it has on what are presumed to be Committed interfaces. Thanks for doing this; it's well past tim

EOF of plotting components [PSARC/2009/540 FastTrack timeout 10/21/2009]

2009-10-08 Thread Richard L. Hamilton
> Note also that users who might still have such ancient hardware (or want > to plot to a terminal device) might find they are able to plot to it using > the "gnuplot" command, which has output drivers for it. (Gnuplot is not yet > integrated, but this is expected as it was approved as part of PSAR

EOF of plotting components [PSARC/2009/540 FastTrack timeout 10/21/2009]

2009-10-07 Thread Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems
The following fast track (submitted on my own behalf) straddles (IMO) the boundary between a full-case and a fast track, primarily because of the impact it has on what are presumed to be Committed interfaces. It seems fairly straight-forward to me, but other members may feel otherwise. With that i