Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.66 04/17/08 SMI
This information is Copyright 2008 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
Gqview for OpenSolaris
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
Author: Chris Wang
1.3 Date of This Document:
Which version of gqview?
Thanks,
Danek
gqview 2.0.4
--Irene
On Tue, 2008-07-15 at 20:40 -0700, Danek Duvall wrote:
> Which version of gqview?
>
> Thanks,
> Danek
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:06:38PM +0800, Irene Huang wrote:
> gqview 2.0.4
FWIW, I've been using 2.1.5 for some time, which I find quite stable, and
much more featureful than 2.0.4. As a user, I'd appreciate it if you'd
consider moving to the 2.1 line.
Thanks,
Danek
Danek:
Our strategy is to deliver community stable version to Opensolaris,
that's why we plan to ship 2.0.4 version. However, we will merge to
2.1.x version when it announced to become stable version.
Thanks,
Chris
Danek Duvall ??:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:06:38PM +0800, Irene Huang wrote:
On Wed, Jul 16, 2008 at 12:39:19PM +0800, C Wang wrote:
> Our strategy is to deliver community stable version to Opensolaris, that's
> why we plan to ship 2.0.4 version. However, we will merge to 2.1.x version
> when it announced to become stable version.
That would make some sense if there wer
Been using GQView 2.1.5 for quite a while now, never had a single crash...
Danek is absolutely correct, gqview is not being worked on anymore and there
will most probably never be another release... So +1 to 2.1.5
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Where does this tool fit amongst all the other image viewers/editors
that are already available in OpenSolaris (e.g. ImageMagick, eog, gthumb
& gimp)? What does gqview have that none of the others provide? Are any
of the others made obsolete by the addition of gqview?
Shi-Ying Irene Huang wrot
James:
We haven't shipped ImageMagick on Solaris, Gimp is a image editor tool,
it contains many image processing operations and filter, and can be used
to create special effect image. eog is a simple image viewer, the
advantage of eog is the launch speed, so we associate most of image
format wi
C Wang wrote:
> James:
> We haven't shipped ImageMagick on Solaris,
Well it's on my system. I think it was integrated with GNOME back in
'06? [LSARC/2006/202 GNOME 2.14] perhaps?
$ uname -a
SunOS harley 5.11 snv_79a i86pc i386 i86pc
$ pkginfo -l SUNWimagick
PKGINST: SUNWimagick
NAME
C Wang wrote:
> We haven't shipped ImageMagick on Solaris,
Yes, we have, since Solaris 10.See /usr/sfw/bin/convert, display, etc.
on older builds, /usr/bin in newer builds.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems, Inc. - X Window System
On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:32:16AM -0400, James Gates wrote:
> C Wang wrote:
>> James:
>> We haven't shipped ImageMagick on Solaris,
>
> Well it's on my system. I think it was integrated with GNOME back in '06?
> [LSARC/2006/202 GNOME 2.14] perhaps?
ImageMagick was integrated (into SFW) by the
I didn't notice that, thanks for clarify.
Chris
Danek Duvall ??:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:32:16AM -0400, James Gates wrote:
>
>
>> C Wang wrote:
>>
>>> James:
>>> We haven't shipped ImageMagick on Solaris,
>>>
>> Well it's on my system. I think it was integrated with GNOME back
Danek:
I tested the 2.1.x release and found the new feature "pan view" has some
significant performance issue, I don't think we can ship the product
without fix this issue, I'll try to contact the maintainer to see if we
can work together to fix the problem. For the time being, we will stay
wit
OK, So the decision is to ship 2.0.4 for the time being, since 2.1.x has
a significant performance issue.
If there any objections or further issues regarding this case, please
send and email before the deadline 07/22/2008. Or I'll close the case as
approved.
--Irene
On Fri, 2008-07-18 at 11:36
Chris:
Is it a good idea to integrate an application which hasn't been actively
maintained in a year-and-a-half, and which also has very similar
functionality to gthumb? While I appreciate giving users choice, I'm
not sure that a program which isn't being actively developed anymore is
the best "
Brian:
Although the gqview is not actively developed in the past one and half year,
there has no officially announcement the project is terminated.
Personnaly,I think gqview 2.0.4 is a very stable release, it will not spend
much effort to maintain it, and we are not going to ship it by default,
t
C Wang wrote:
> Brian:
> Although the gqview is not actively developed in the past one and half year,
> there has no officially announcement the project is terminated.
>
> Personnaly,I think gqview 2.0.4 is a very stable release, it will not spend
> much effort to maintain it, and we are not going
Chris:
> Although the gqview is not actively developed in the past one and half
> year, there has no officially announcement the project is terminated.
Just to be clear, I don't think my comments about how well Gqview is
maintained should affect whether this ARC case is approved or not.
Getting
Brian:
Brian Cameron ??:
>
> Chris:
>
>> Although the gqview is not actively developed in the past one and
>> half year, there has no officially announcement the project is
>> terminated.
>
> Just to be clear, I don't think my comments about how well Gqview is
> maintained should affect whether
So there's no blocking issues for this case, if there's no more
discussion for this case within 24 hours
I'll close this case as approved.
Thanks
--Irene
On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 11:17 +0800, C Wang wrote:
> Brian:
>
>
> Brian Cameron ??:
> >
> > Chris:
> >
> >> Although the gqview is not
close approved
--Irene
On Mon, 2008-07-28 at 13:25 +0800, Irene Huang wrote:
> So there's no blocking issues for this case, if there's no more
> discussion for this case within 24 hours
>
> I'll close this case as approved.
>
> Thanks
>
> --Irene
>
> On Thu, 2008-07-24 at 11:17 +0800, C Wa
22 matches
Mail list logo
