Joerg Schilling wrote:
> "Garrett D'Amore" wrote:
>
> > Sorry, I just saw the answers to question #1 in section 4.2. (I.e. "no".)
>
> The ON sed sources are still non-free, so it we need to think about a free
> replacement.
That's already on my ToDo list...
Bye,
Roland
--
__ . . __
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 11, 2008 at 10:38:23AM +0200, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > "Garrett D'Amore" wrote:
[snip]
> > Cleanly written scripts (e.g. autoconf) do not depend on the non-portable
> > extensions.
>
> But the world isn't perfect, and including GNU sed doesn't cost us much
