Roland Mainz wrote:
> Glenn Fowler wrote:
>> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:41:07 -0400 James Carlson wrote:
>>> April Chin writes:
> [snip]
>>> Whatever bit of text documents this path (the original case proposed
>>> "Volatile" stability for the /usr/ast/bin mechanism, which means it's
>>> a public interf
Felix Schulte wrote:
> On 9/26/06, Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > Darren J Moffat wrote:
> > > April Chin wrote:
> > > > An update from the project team on the pfksh93 issue...
> > > >
> > > > Although some ideas on disabling built-ins for pfksh93
> > > > has been proposed, the team has agreed to rem
Glenn Fowler wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 16:16:00 -0400 James Carlson wrote:
> > > maybe for now pf should trump all builtins but the ones already allowed
> > > whether by /usr/ast/bin or not
>
> > That'd be the least problematic answer.
>
> > > is this a restriction issue? is a user knowingly e
Glenn Fowler wrote:
> On Mon, 25 Sep 2006 15:41:07 -0400 James Carlson wrote:
> > April Chin writes:
[snip]
> > Whatever bit of text documents this path (the original case proposed
> > "Volatile" stability for the /usr/ast/bin mechanism, which means it's
> > a public interface) should note that it
On Wed, 27 Sep 2006 05:00:36 +0200 Roland Mainz wrote:
> Glenn Fowler wrote:
> > ok
> > I think it would be possible for us to configure a pfksh93 that allows
> > only a predefined set of builtins (matching those already allowed)
> > and no runtime builtin additions
> I think users should still b
