PSARC/2008/179 cross link-editor

2008-03-12 Thread casper....@sun.com
>Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: >> For Solaris we generally do not use auto configuration; this includes even >> things like perl. > >s/Solaris/ON/ - there's a lot of autoconfiguration in the rest of Solaris - >X, JDS, SFW - probably more software is autoconfigured there than delivered >by all of ON

PSARC/2008/179 cross link-editor

2008-03-12 Thread casper....@sun.com
>Nicolas Williams wrote: > >> On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:24:13PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > >> > The problem with crosss compilations is that it does not really work if >> > the >> > software uses dynamic autoconfiguration for portability. >> >> That doesn't make cross-compilation useless.

PSARC/2008/179 cross link-editor

2008-03-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
"Garrett D'Amore" wrote: > Most of ON is not autoconfigured. The only exceptions I can think of > would likely be related to 3rd party software (perl?) > > Certainly NetBSD has found solutions to this problem. :-) > > I wouldn't mind putting some of the 3rd party software that depends on > suc

PSARC/2008/179 cross link-editor

2008-03-12 Thread Joerg Schilling
Nicolas Williams wrote: > On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:24:13PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > > The problem with crosss compilations is that it does not really work if the > > software uses dynamic autoconfiguration for portability. > > That doesn't make cross-compilation useless. I don't like

PSARC/2008/179 cross link-editor

2008-03-12 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Casper.Dik at Sun.COM wrote: > For Solaris we generally do not use auto configuration; this includes even > things like perl. s/Solaris/ON/ - there's a lot of autoconfiguration in the rest of Solaris - X, JDS, SFW - probably more software is autoconfigured there than delivered by all of ON. --

PSARC/2008/179 cross link-editor

2008-03-11 Thread Joerg Schilling
Joseph Kowalski wrote: > All I can say is "don't hold your breath". I first picked up "this > particular torch" in around 1990. I suspect that others picked it up > before then. The compiler group had always responded, "not worth the > test matrix". It also seems that we were the major req

PSARC/2008/179 cross link-editor

2008-03-11 Thread Joseph Kowalski
Joerg Schilling wrote: > Joseph Kowalski wrote: > > >> All I can say is "don't hold your breath". I first picked up "this >> particular torch" in around 1990. I suspect that others picked it up >> before then. The compiler group had always responded, "not worth the >> test matrix". It al

PSARC/2008/179 cross link-editor

2008-03-11 Thread Nicolas Williams
On Tue, Mar 11, 2008 at 03:24:13PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote: > Joseph Kowalski wrote: > > > All I can say is "don't hold your breath". I first picked up "this > > particular torch" in around 1990. I suspect that others picked it up > > before then. The compiler group had always responded

PSARC/2008/179 cross link-editor

2008-03-11 Thread Garrett D'Amore
Joerg Schilling wrote: > Joseph Kowalski wrote: > > >> All I can say is "don't hold your breath". I first picked up "this >> particular torch" in around 1990. I suspect that others picked it up >> before then. The compiler group had always responded, "not worth the >> test matrix". It al