Darren J Moffat wrote:
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
This case looks reasonable as specified, however I do have one
question.
Given hal is (or at least has been) used on Linux/BSD systems do
they already have this or a similar ioctl ? Is there any value in
being
This case looks reasonable as specified, however I do have one question.
Given hal is (or at least has been) used on Linux/BSD systems do they
already have this or a similar ioctl ? Is there any value in being
compatible or is this an area where HAL is supposed to be operating
system specific
Darren J Moffat wrote:
This case looks reasonable as specified, however I do have one question.
Given hal is (or at least has been) used on Linux/BSD systems do they
already have this or a similar ioctl ? Is there any value in being
compatible or is this an area where HAL is supposed to be
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
This case looks reasonable as specified, however I do have one question.
Given hal is (or at least has been) used on Linux/BSD systems do they
already have this or a similar ioctl ? Is there any value in being
compatible or is this an area
