Darren J Moffat Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Is libscsi intended to be a project private lib that is undocumented and
not available as shared library?
Summary of Exported Interfaces, all Contracted Consolidation Private:
...
SCSI libraries and private
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Is libscsi intended to be a project private lib that is undocumented and
not available as shared library?
Summary of Exported Interfaces, all Contracted Consolidation Private:
...
SCSI
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Is libscsi intended to be a project private lib that is undocumented and
not available as shared library?
Summary of Exported Interfaces, all Contracted Consolidation Private:
...
SCSI
Andrew Gabriel Andrew.Gabriel at Sun.COM wrote:
Then avoid name space pollution and do not use a generic name for this lib.
There is no clash.
/usr/lib is for bundled Solaris software. See filesystem(5).
It is not the first time that I have objections because the ARC happily
ignores
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat Darren.Moffat at Sun.COM wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Is libscsi intended to be a project private lib that is undocumented and
not available as shared library?
Summary of Exported Interfaces, all Contracted Consolidation Private:
...
SCSI
James C. McPherson James.McPherson at Sun.COM wrote:
I expect - since this is an Open fasttrack - that the materials
should show up on opensolaris.org fairly soon.
Perhaps you might want to check the directory
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2008/196
in a few hours (give
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 06:45:35PM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Is libscsi intended to be a project private lib that is undocumented and
not available as shared library?
From the spec at
http://www.opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2008/196/incept-materials/spec-txt/:
# Summary of
Joerg Schilling wrote:
James C. McPherson James.McPherson at Sun.COM wrote:
I expect - since this is an Open fasttrack - that the materials
should show up on opensolaris.org fairly soon.
Perhaps you might want to check the directory
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2008/196
James C. McPherson wrote:
Has this fasttrack timed out and got an automatic approval yet?
It was approved during ARC business at today's PSARC meeting.
The case owner needs to update the case status.
--
-Alan Coopersmith- alan.coopersmith at sun.com
Sun Microsystems,
James C. McPherson wrote:
Has this fasttrack timed out and got an automatic approval yet?
Yes, at 10:10am PDT in PSARC this morning.
-John
On Wed, Mar 26, 2008 at 03:43:07PM -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote:
James C. McPherson wrote:
Has this fasttrack timed out and got an automatic approval yet?
It was approved during ARC business at today's PSARC meeting.
The case owner needs to update the case status.
Done.
-Mike
--
Mike
Eric Schrock wrote:
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:01:36AM +1000, James C. McPherson wrote:
Hi Eric,
Could we get some common status code mappings / handlers
added to ses2.h? Something common that makes use of the
definitions in ses2_dl_ucode_status would probably be a
good thing.
I'm not
James -
There are two problems with this:
- The microcode status is exposed as part of a plugin, not as core
libses functionality. So there is no way to expose a function on top
of that. Any additional information should be presented in the
nvlist, not as part of a separate callback.
-
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 10:01:36AM +1000, James C. McPherson wrote:
Hi Eric,
Could we get some common status code mappings / handlers
added to ses2.h? Something common that makes use of the
definitions in ses2_dl_ucode_status would probably be a
good thing.
I'm not sure what you're
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 04:19:46PM -0700, Mike Shapiro wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:07:17AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
If you don't know, such a library already exists since August 1986, so why
should there be another one.
Solaris is allowed to have whatever namespace of whatever
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:32:46PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
Well...
While working on the SQLite3 integration into SFW Mike Sullivan
requested that a heads up be sent to the w-team just in case there are
library name conflicts elsewhere. Mike (Sullivan) went so far as to
assert that
On Mon, Mar 17, 2008 at 04:32:46PM -0500, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Thu, Mar 13, 2008 at 04:19:46PM -0700, Mike Shapiro wrote:
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:07:17AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
If you don't know, such a library already exists since August 1986, so
why
should there be
Mike Shapiro mws at sun.com wrote:
I'm sponsoring the following fast-track for Eric Schrock and Keith
Wesolowski to introduce new Private libscsi and libses libraries.
The case timer is set for 3/19 and the binding is for a Patch release.
A copy of the spec (below) is also saved in the
Mike Shapiro mws at sun.com wrote:
Please do not call something libscsi unless you prove that this library
really an abstraction from the low level transport interface and the
Solaris
platform.
That's what libscsi is.
Then send an interface description to allow to check whether
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Mike Shapiro mws at sun.com wrote:
Please do not call something libscsi unless you prove that this library
really an abstraction from the low level transport interface and the
Solaris
platform.
That's what libscsi is.
Then send an interface description to
James C. McPherson James.McPherson at Sun.COM wrote:
I expect - since this is an Open fasttrack - that the materials
should show up on opensolaris.org fairly soon.
Perhaps you might want to check the directory
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2008/196
in a few hours (give
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/arc/caselog/2008/196
in a few hours (give the synchronisation time to occur).
The data is (14+ hours later) still missing.
The mirroring script runs in the wee hours of the morning
here in California; it takes several to many hours to run
(mostly due to
On Fri, Mar 14, 2008 at 12:07:17AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
Mike Shapiro mws at sun.com wrote:
I'm sponsoring the following fast-track for Eric Schrock and Keith
Wesolowski to introduce new Private libscsi and libses libraries.
The case timer is set for 3/19 and the binding is for
Its not updated yet. I've attached a copy of libscsi.h for Joerg's benefit.
-- Garrett
James C. McPherson wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Mike Shapiro mws at sun.com wrote:
Please do not call something libscsi unless you prove that this
library really an abstraction from the low level
24 matches
Mail list logo
