Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Peter Cudhea wrote:
> > It would be useful to take a definitive stand on whether or not
> > operations on two adjacent bool values are atomic with respect to one
> > another. E.g. back in the days of the DEC Alpha, there existed no
> > instructions that could modify the va
Peter Cudhea wrote:
> On 08/10/09 19:35, Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems wrote:
> > Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
> > This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
> > 1. Introduction
> > 1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
> >sys/stdbool.h
> > 1.2.
Roland Mainz wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>
>> Peter Cudhea wrote:
>>
>>> It would be useful to take a definitive stand on whether or not
>>> operations on two adjacent bool values are atomic with respect to one
>>> another. E.g. back in the days of the DEC Alpha, there existed no
>>> i
It would be useful to take a definitive stand on whether or not
operations on two adjacent bool values are atomic with respect to one
another. E.g. back in the days of the DEC Alpha, there existed no
instructions that could modify the value of one bool in a word without
potentially interfering
Garrett D'Amore - sun microsystems wrote:
> Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
> This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
> 1. Introduction
> 1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
>sys/stdbool.h
+1
--
Darren J Moffat
Peter Cudhea wrote:
> It would be useful to take a definitive stand on whether or not
> operations on two adjacent bool values are atomic with respect to one
> another. E.g. back in the days of the DEC Alpha, there existed no
> instructions that could modify the value of one bool in a word with
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.68 02/23/09 SMI
This information is Copyright 2009 Sun Microsystems
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
sys/stdbool.h
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
Author: Garrett D'Amore
1.3 Date of This Document:
