Updated proposal has been put into the case and is included below.
This case has been scheduled for the PSARC meeting of 28-April-2010.
Thanks
pete
1. Introduction
1.1 Project/Component Working Name:
SER removal
1.2 Name of Document Author/Supplier:
Author: Lukas Rovensky
1.3 Date
On 03/31/10 12:19 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
The project team has decided to change the proposal to remove the
contentious builtins for /usr/gnu. Instead, only /usr/bin and
/usr/xpg4,xpg6 utilities are being provided as builtins. As these
utilities will hopefully one day be converted to use the
All,
I am sponsoring this case for Laszlo (Laca) Peter of the desktop group.
I have set the timeout for Wednesday, April 21st, 2010. The case directory
contains this proposal.
This case proposes to integrate pkgbuild into a Minor release of Solaris.
pkgbuild is the build engine developed by
All,
I am sponsoring this case for Stefan Teleman of the SFW group.
I have set the timeout for Wednesday, April 21st, 2010. The case
directory contains this proposal.
This case proposes the removal of conflict from a Minor release of
Solaris (i.e., Nevada). This component of SFW was only
All,
I am sponsoring this case for Stefan Teleman of the SFW group.
I have set the timeout for Wednesday, April 21st, 2010. The case
directory contains this proposal.
This case proposes the removal of conflict from a Minor release of
Solaris (i.e., Nevada). This component of SFW was only
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 09:12:03AM -0700, John Fischer wrote:
2.Technical Issues
2.1.Availability through OpenSolaris /contrib repository
The OpenSolaris /contrib repository [1] is a more appropriate
mechanism for delivering Conflict to interested consumers.
All,
I must be having a bad morning.
The timeout is set for April 28th, 2010 and not April
21st, 2010.
Thanks,
John
On 04/21/10 09:14 AM, John Fischer wrote:
All,
I am sponsoring this case for Stefan Teleman of the SFW group.
I have set the timeout for Wednesday, April 21st, 2010. The
All,
The timeout is set for April 28th, 2010 and not April 21st, 2010.
Thanks,
John
On 04/21/10 09:12 AM, John Fischer wrote:
All,
I am sponsoring this case for Stefan Teleman of the SFW group.
I have set the timeout for Wednesday, April 21st, 2010. The case
directory contains this
On 04/21/10 09:14, John Fischer wrote:
2.1.Availability through OpenSolaris /contrib repository
The OpenSolaris /contrib repository [1] is a more appropriate
mechanism for delivering Areca Backup to interested consumers.
A separate and independent project
(reminder - I extended this until Friday)
Here is the opinion for PSARC/2010/059 SNAP BE Management.
http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/059/opinion_draft.txt
I request a commitment email vote.
Cheers,
Jim
___
opensolaris-arc mailing list
On 04/21/10 01:27 PM, Jim Walker wrote:
(reminder - I extended this until Friday)
Here is the opinion for PSARC/2010/059 SNAP BE Management.
http://arc.opensolaris.org/caselog/PSARC/2010/059/opinion_draft.txt
I request a commitment email vote.
Suggestion: Perhaps a subject line starting
On 04/21/10 01:19 PM, Bart Smaalders wrote:
On 04/21/10 09:14, John Fischer wrote:
2.1. Availability through OpenSolaris /contrib repository
The OpenSolaris /contrib repository [1] is a more appropriate
mechanism for delivering Areca Backup to interested consumers.
A separate and independent
SYSTEM ARCHITECTURE COUNCIL
Platform Software ARC
-
PSARC Regular Meeting time: Wednesdays 10:00-1:00pm in MPK17-3507.
04-21-2010 MEETING MINUTES
This case was approved in today's meeting.
-tim
___
opensolaris-arc mailing list
opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org
On 04/21/10 02:40 PM, Sebastien Roy wrote:
On 04/21/10 03:07 PM, Norm Jacobs wrote:
On 04/21/10 12:37 PM, Sebastien Roy wrote:
On 04/21/10 01:19 PM, Bart Smaalders wrote:
It seems that someone actually needs to own and maintain contrib
for this plan to go forward; right now contrib is not
Norm Jacobs wrote:
On 04/21/10 02:40 PM, Sebastien Roy wrote:
I think there is perhaps general confusion about the relationship
between the /contrib repository and the product.
Yes, they did bring up the /contrib repository and they do intend on
making it available there, but the reality is
On 04/21/10 16:18, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 03:56:25PM -0700, Hugh McIntyre wrote:
Norm Jacobs wrote:
Now, from a more practical standpoint, it is a place where people
can build and deliver software not in the product, but may be
useful as an add-on to the product.
17 matches
Mail list logo
