Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.70 03/30/10 SMI
This information is Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All
rights reserved.
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
Private Crypto Framework header files
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
On 05/25/10 01:24, Antonello Cruz wrote:
On 05/22/10 09:35 AM, Felix Feng wrote:
于 2010-5-22 00:19, Garrett D'Amore 写�:
Does it make sense to use some special value (zero or -1) to mean
uninitialized? That way could at least preserve the type.
But the special value is invalid for keyboar
On 05/24/10 19:16, Felix Feng wrote:
On 05/25/10 01:24, Antonello Cruz wrote:
On 05/22/10 09:35 AM, Felix Feng wrote:
于 2010-5-22 00:19, Garrett D'Amore 写�:
Does it make sense to use some special value (zero or -1) to mean
uninitialized? That way could at least preserve the type.
But th
here are updates to the documentation that include the RTF_ZONE related
changes, as well as those based on Erik's comments about allowing
persistent interface configuration management in the non-global zone.
The full text of the updated document is attached. The diffs are:
--- zonecfg.txt 2010
On 05/24/10 10:48 PM, Felix Feng wrote:
On 05/24/10 19:16, Felix Feng wrote:
On 05/25/10 01:24, Antonello Cruz wrote:
On 05/22/10 09:35 AM, Felix Feng wrote:
于 2010-5-22 00:19, Garrett D'Amore 写�:
Does it make sense to use some special value (zero or -1) to mean
uninitialized? That way
This is a minor update to an already approved case:
PSARC/2009/366 (CIFS client updates for auto-reconnect)
I am filing this as a "case note", but if anyone thinks
this should have it's own case, let me know and I'll get
this submitted as a new fasttrack.
We propose to change the way smbiod(1M) pr
On 05/25/10 04:01 PM, Dan Price wrote:
I am filing this case on behalf of myself. This case completes work
begun half a decade ago in PSARC/2005/592, by EOFing the FMLI facility.
Given the context of lu going away, this is rather straightforward. +1
-Seb
_
Template Version: @(#)sac_nextcase 1.70 03/30/10 SMI
This information is Copyright (c) 2010, Oracle and/or its affiliates. All
rights reserved.
1. Introduction
1.1. Project/Component Working Name:
ZFS backup options
1.2. Name of Document Author/Supplier:
Author: Thomas
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:40:54AM -0700, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> /* That's what getpassphrase(3c) supports. */
> #define PK11_MAX_TOKEN_PIN_LEN 256
...
> int pkcs11_parse_uri(const char *str, pkcs11_uri_t *uri);
>
> Return codes are defined:
...
> #define PK11_MUTEX_ERROR6
Nicolas Williams wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 03:40:54AM -0700, Darren J Moffat wrote:
>> /* That's what getpassphrase(3c) supports. */
>> #define PK11_MAX_TOKEN_PIN_LEN 256
> ...
>> int pkcs11_parse_uri(const char *str, pkcs11_uri_t *uri);
>>
>> Return codes are defined:
> ...
>>
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 05:00:50PM -0400, James Carlson wrote:
> Nicolas Williams wrote:
> > Hmmm, I think it'd have been better to have the function return an error
> > when a PIN is need and let the app call it again with the PIN -- let the
> > app prompt for a PIN.
> >
> > There's no way to dea
On Tue 25 May 2010 at 04:17PM, Sebastien Roy wrote:
> On 05/25/10 04:01 PM, Dan Price wrote:
> >I am filing this case on behalf of myself. This case completes work
> >begun half a decade ago in PSARC/2005/592, by EOFing the FMLI facility.
>
> Given the context of lu going away, this is rather str
On 05/25/10 04:51 PM, Dan Price wrote:
On Tue 25 May 2010 at 04:17PM, Sebastien Roy wrote:
On 05/25/10 04:01 PM, Dan Price wrote:
I am filing this case on behalf of myself. This case completes work
begun half a decade ago in PSARC/2005/592, by EOFing the FMLI facility.
Given the context of l
On 05/20/10 02:47 PM, Jan Setje-Eilers wrote:
On 05/20/10 14:18, Scott Rotondo wrote:
On 05/20/10 01:51 PM, Seth Goldberg wrote:
Hi,
Instead of "trust-bios-boot-device", can we name it something like
"automatic-boot-archive-recovery"? Future firmware support will not use
the bios-boot-device p
On May 25, 2010, at 4:20 PM, Scott Rotondo
wrote:
On 05/20/10 02:47 PM, Jan Setje-Eilers wrote:
On 05/20/10 14:18, Scott Rotondo wrote:
On 05/20/10 01:51 PM, Seth Goldberg wrote:
Hi,
Instead of "trust-bios-boot-device", can we name it something like
"automatic-boot-archive-recovery"? F
U28gKzEgb24gdGhlIGNhc2UsIHNpbmNlIHRoZSBpc3N1ZXMgc2VlbSBzZXR0bGVkIG5vdy4KCiAg
IC0tIEdhcnJldHQKCiJzZXRoLmdvbGRiZXJnQG9yYWNsZS5jb20iIDxzZXRoLmdvbGRiZXJnQG9y
YWNsZS5jb20+IHdyb3RlOgoKPgo+Cj5PbiBNYXkgMjUsIDIwMTAsIGF0IDQ6MjAgUE0sIFNjb3R0
IFJvdG9uZG8gPHNjb3R0LnJvdG9uZG9Ab3JhY2xlLmNvbT4gIAo+d3JvdGU6Cj4KPj4g
On 05/25/10 16:58, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Which decodes too:
>
> So +1 on the case, since the issues seem settled now.
>
> -- Garrett
>
-jan
___
opensolaris-arc mailing list
opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org
On 05/25/10 09:32 PM, Felix Feng wrote:
On 05/26/10 00:11, Antonello Cruz wrote:
On 05/24/10 10:48 PM, Felix Feng wrote:
On 05/24/10 19:16, Felix Feng wrote:
On 05/25/10 01:24, Antonello Cruz wrote:
On 05/22/10 09:35 AM, Felix Feng wrote:
于 2010-5-22 00:19, Garrett D'Amore 写é“:
Does it
On 05/25/10 19:36, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 05/25/10 09:32 PM, Felix Feng wrote:
On 05/26/10 00:11, Antonello Cruz wrote:
Won't the users and installers have to change the null/empty value
with the value they want to configure the keyboard? How is that any
different than changing the value?
Ye
Thanks Jan. I used the mail client on my Android phone, to reply -- not
sure why it garbled it into base 64. Interestingly enough, even the
encoding client couldn't read the resulting message when it came back
from the e-mail list. I suspect there may have been some bad
interaction between t
On 05/26/10 00:11, Antonello Cruz wrote:
On 05/24/10 10:48 PM, Felix Feng wrote:
On 05/24/10 19:16, Felix Feng wrote:
On 05/25/10 01:24, Antonello Cruz wrote:
On 05/22/10 09:35 AM, Felix Feng wrote:
于 2010-5-22 00:19, Garrett D'Amore 写�:
Does it make sense to use some special value (ze
On 05/26/10 10:36, Shawn Walker wrote:
On 05/25/10 09:32 PM, Felix Feng wrote:
On 05/26/10 00:11, Antonello Cruz wrote:
On 05/24/10 10:48 PM, Felix Feng wrote:
On 05/24/10 19:16, Felix Feng wrote:
On 05/25/10 01:24, Antonello Cruz wrote:
On 05/22/10 09:35 AM, Felix Feng wrote:
于 2010-5-22
22 matches
Mail list logo
