I'm happy with the technical content of this case so it gets my +1 on
the understanding that the project team will be delivering this with
PSARC/2010/178 so that there is a mapper delivered with the framework.
--
Darren J Moffat
___
opensolaris-arc
On Wed, 26 May 2010, Darren J Moffat wrote:
I'm happy with the technical content of this case so it gets my +1 on the
understanding that the project team will be delivering this with
PSARC/2010/178
so that there is a mapper delivered with the framework.
yes, that is correct. Thanks,
I am sponsoring this fasttrack for myself. Timer is set to 06/02/2010.
Design document: materials/cong-design.pdf
(This case was initially filed as a full case, but at the inception
meeting is was decided to convert it to a fasttrack, once the design has
been reviewed by the networking
This case seems like a good thing, but I'm not an expert enough on
Kerberos to know if it meets all the needs that folks are going to
want. I'd like to hear, if possible, from other folks more intimate
with Kerberos before giving this a +1.
Also, your stability levels need to be modernized.
On (05/26/10 14:36), Sebastien Roy wrote:
The above semantics will be slightly different in solaris10 branded zones
since there are no persistent interface objects in such zones. In such
zones, I believe it would be sufficient for ipmgmtd to configure everything
non-persistently and
On (05/26/10 14:36), Sebastien Roy wrote:
The above semantics will be slightly different in solaris10 branded zones
since there are no persistent interface objects in such zones. In such
zones, I believe it would be sufficient for ipmgmtd to configure
everything
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 11:41:51AM -0700, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Also, your stability levels need to be modernized. We don't use
Evolving and Unstable anymore.. Perhaps you mean Uncommitted and
Volatile?
DTrace sticks to the old taxonomy.
___
So, that feedback (especially the broader review on both the lists) is
good to know.
I'm happy with the materials enough myself, and with the level of review
that it has apparently already received, to go ahead and give this a
purely procedural +1 myself. :-)
- Garrett
On 5/26/2010
On 05/21/10 08:31 AM, James Carlson wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
On 21/05/2010 12:20, James Carlson wrote:
On 05/20/10 22:51, Don Cragun wrote:
Since it is defined in the Solaris 10 limits.h(3HEAD) man page, a
Conforming POSIX Application Using Extensions is free to use
LOGNAME_MAX as
I attached an updated case with the following changes:
Dave Pacheco wrote:
In section A, paragraph 4: I still find the terminology of saying that
zfs send -b is used to restore properties from the original
dataset confusing, since it's really just generating a stream that
will later be
10 matches
Mail list logo
