;>
>> Barry
>>
>> Phi Tran wrote:
>>> On 06/30/10 13:54, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 2010-06-30 at 13:40 -0700, Seth Goldberg wrote:
>>>>> On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Garrett D'Amore
>>>>> wrote:
>>&
On Jun 30, 2010, at 1:35 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> Generally, I think this project is doing the right things. But a few
> issues:
>
> a) BMC API is listed as Consolidation Private. Are there consumers
> outside of ON? If not, then you could probably just nuke the BMC API.
> If there *are
Hi,
If you forward your analysis to us, we can add it to a bug for you.Surely
we can come up with a way to optimize environment handling (perhaps with a new
interface that future executables will use, while deprecating the existing
mechanism). Such pathological performance is certainly a
Hi,
Instead of "trust-bios-boot-device", can we name it something like
"automatic-boot-archive-recovery"? Future firmware support will not use
the bios-boot-device property, and the property name should reflect its actual
use instead of its implementation detail.
Also: the text:
