Re: PSARC 2010/245 EOF of amr

2010-07-08 Thread Garrett D'Amore
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 07:13 -0700, Alan Coopersmith wrote: > Garrett D'Amore wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 01:20 +0200, ольга крыжановская wrote: > >> The comment was in reply to your mail to Asa about closing this case. > >> Sorry for the out of order mail. > > > > As we discussed during the m

Re: PSARC 2010/245 EOF of amr

2010-07-08 Thread Alan Coopersmith
Garrett D'Amore wrote: > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 01:20 +0200, ольга крыжановская wrote: >> The comment was in reply to your mail to Asa about closing this case. >> Sorry for the out of order mail. > > As we discussed during the meeting, Oracle declared the issue of amr a > business matter. The bigg

Re: PSARC 2010/245 EOF of amr

2010-07-08 Thread Milan Jurik
Hi, Garrett D'Amore píše v st 07. 07. 2010 v 21:57 -0700: > On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 01:20 +0200, ольга крыжановская wrote: > > The comment was in reply to your mail to Asa about closing this case. > > Sorry for the out of order mail. > > As we discussed during the meeting, Oracle declared the issue

Re: PSARC 2010/245 EOF of amr

2010-07-07 Thread Garrett D'Amore
On Thu, 2010-07-08 at 01:20 +0200, ольга крыжановская wrote: > The comment was in reply to your mail to Asa about closing this case. > Sorry for the out of order mail. As we discussed during the meeting, Oracle declared the issue of amr a business matter. The bigger concern I have about the impac

Re: PSARC 2010/245 EOF of amr

2010-07-07 Thread ольга крыжановская
The comment was in reply to your mail to Asa about closing this case. Sorry for the out of order mail. Olga 2010/7/8 ольга крыжановская : > What about your concerns for 3rd party vendors and the community? > > Olga > > On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: >> I'm a bit concerned

Re: PSARC 2010/245 EOF of amr

2010-07-07 Thread ольга крыжановская
What about your concerns for 3rd party vendors and the community? Olga On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 7:00 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote: > I'm a bit concerned that we may be premature in EOF'ing AMR. While > *Sun* customers probably didn't use this driver on Sun hardware, the > driver remains in the open

PSARC 2010/245 EOF of amr

2010-07-07 Thread Garrett D'Amore
I'm a bit concerned that we may be premature in EOF'ing AMR. While *Sun* customers probably didn't use this driver on Sun hardware, the driver remains in the open source tree, and appears to have been sold by Dell fairly recently. If Oracle wants to elide this driver from Solaris 11 or Solaris N