+1
On 4/7/2010 9:47 AM, Norm Jacobs wrote:
On 04/ 7/10 10:04 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On 04/ 7/10 08:01 AM, Sebastien Roy wrote:
On 04/ 2/10 12:05 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
This case seeks to remove Uncommitted interfaces from Solaris. These
interfaces were originally delivered in anticipa
On 04/ 7/10 10:04 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
On 04/ 7/10 08:01 AM, Sebastien Roy wrote:
On 04/ 2/10 12:05 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
This case seeks to remove Uncommitted interfaces from Solaris. These
interfaces were originally delivered in anticipation of supporting
another project. There has
On 04/ 7/10 08:01 AM, Sebastien Roy wrote:
On 04/ 2/10 12:05 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
This case seeks to remove Uncommitted interfaces from Solaris. These
interfaces were originally delivered in anticipation of supporting
another project. There has been a change in direction, and these
interfa
On 04/ 2/10 12:05 PM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
This case seeks to remove Uncommitted interfaces from Solaris. These
interfaces were originally delivered in anticipation of supporting
another project. There has been a change in direction, and these
interfaces are no longer needed.
The case needs a
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 11:30:20AM -0500, Norm Jacobs wrote:
> The plan is to move them to /contrib (see section 4.1).
Whoops! Please forgive my wasting your time.
___
opensolaris-arc mailing list
opensolaris-arc@opensolaris.org
On 04/ 6/10 11:17 AM, Nicolas Williams wrote:
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 11:05:41AM -0500, Norm Jacobs wrote:
On 04/ 6/10 09:57 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
michael.kear...@oracle.com wrote:
The LSARC just put Drools in Solaris last May. What am I missing her
On Tue, Apr 06, 2010 at 11:05:41AM -0500, Norm Jacobs wrote:
> On 04/ 6/10 09:57 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
> >michael.kear...@oracle.com wrote:
> >
> >>The LSARC just put Drools in Solaris last May. What am I missing here?
> >I am also a bit confused as I remember that the int
On 04/ 6/10 09:57 AM, joerg.schill...@fokus.fraunhofer.de wrote:
michael.kear...@oracle.com wrote:
The LSARC just put Drools in Solaris last May. What am I missing here?
I am also a bit confused as I remember that the intrgration of "antlr" that
happened recently.
Why are generic t
michael.kear...@oracle.com wrote:
> The LSARC just put Drools in Solaris last May. What am I missing here?
I am also a bit confused as I remember that the intrgration of "antlr" that
happened recently.
Why are generic tools first added and soon removed again?
Jörg
--
EMail:jo...@schily.is
Oh, long live ADM!
Thanks,
Michael
On 4/5/2010 10:12 AM, Norm Jacobs wrote:
The project that intended on consuming it was canceled. There are no
consumers and no staff to support it.
-Norm
On 04/ 5/10 11:06 AM, michael.kear...@oracle.com wrote:
The LSARC just put Drools in Sol
The project that intended on consuming it was canceled. There are no
consumers and no staff to support it.
-Norm
On 04/ 5/10 11:06 AM, michael.kear...@oracle.com wrote:
The LSARC just put Drools in Solaris last May. What am I missing here?
Regards,
Michael
On 4/2/2010 10:
The LSARC just put Drools in Solaris last May. What am I missing here?
Regards,
Michael
On 4/2/2010 10:05 AM, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
(Due to what I think was an error on my part -- failure to ensure that
the Proprietary keyword was removed -- this mail did not go out. This
is an o
(Due to what I think was an error on my part -- failure to ensure that
the Proprietary keyword was removed -- this mail did not go out. This is
an open fast track, timer was set for April 7. 2010. I'd like to leave
the timer alone, but if folks want a longer timeout, let me know and
I'll bump i
13 matches
Mail list logo
