On 7/23/05, Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Using this script along with a piece of software that uses the GNU
> auto* tools will make packaging pretty darn easy. The hard part is
> getting the project to compile usually.
I've since further enhanced it to account for "copyright", "depend
Ditto. Sync'ing up now.
Dennis Clarke wrote:
> On 7/25/05, Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>>Mike Kupfer is off today, but build 18 is now available via SDLC.
>
>
> Excellent. I was looking forward to this code drop.
>
> Thank you Keith :-)
>
>
> Dennis Clarke
> Director
On 7/25/05, Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Mike Kupfer is off today, but build 18 is now available via SDLC.
Excellent. I was looking forward to this code drop.
Thank you Keith :-)
Dennis Clarke
Director and Admin for blastwave.org
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
_
Mike Kupfer is off today, but build 18 is now available via SDLC.
Other download options will follow. Here are the release notes:
OpenSolaris Buildable Source
@(#)ReleaseNotes1.132005/07/22 SMI
Note: if this is your first OpenSolaris installation
On Mon, 2005-07-25 at 20:14, Peter Memishian wrote:
> > However, I think that fixing up Solaris to support long usernames is
> > definitely worthwhile and long overdue.
>
> there's a longstanding open bug on this: 4109819.
there's also a long_usernames keyword which should be placed on other
bu
> However, I think that fixing up Solaris to support long usernames is
> definitely worthwhile and long overdue.
there's a longstanding open bug on this: 4109819.
--
meem
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
https://ope
Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> noted:
>>>
>>>while fixing some lint indicated bugs in acltext.c for star,
>>>I found that acltext.c still uses the historical LOGNAME_MAX
>>>which is defined to 8.
>>>
>>>Since some time, /var/adm/utmp id no longer used so the maximum
>>>user/group name length n
For those that couldn't see Rod's great explanation (I'm guessing his
CC to the list bounced):
-- Forwarded message --
From: Rod Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Jul 24, 2005 9:45 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-code] Library Question
To: Peter Memishian <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: Shawn Walker <
> I've always wondered...why are shared libraries installed under *NIX
> operating systems with the executable bit set?
IIRC, the executable bit is used by the SunOS VM subsystem as a hint when
looking for
free memory. The VM subsystem prefers to free pure data pages (files without
the
executab
Shawn Walker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I took Philip Brown's gnutopkg script that's as Phil describes it:
> "A script to AUTOMATICALLY package any GNU autoconf/automake based software"
>
> and basically made it more robust in that it handles Makefile and
> makefile, as well as providing more in
On 25 Jul 2005, at 01:04, Peter Memishian wrote:
an excellent question -- and to add insult to injury, attempting to
execute them is far from pretty:
$ /lib/libc.so
usage: ld.so.1 [-e option,...] dynamic-object [object args,...]
Killed
$ /lib/libnsl.so
Illegal Instruction (core dumped)
11 matches
Mail list logo
