consolidations
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Approved: code
> > >OS/Networking HIGH
> > Isn't this already *done*?
>
> There are still components being examined
--On September 7, 2005 7:31:47 AM -0700 Karyn Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Good point. Someone within Sun mentioned that as well, and I completely
forgot about it when I sent this mail -- sorry. What would be useful? I
can probably send out a document that has a mapping of every package to
> I'd also personally bump the docs to high so that
> people can start
> ramping up to get involved more closely with the doc
> effort.
>
> benr.
Ben,
We are trying to break down documentation into more discrete tasks that can be
managed, tracked and achieved. So far, we've broken the project
consolidations
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Approved: code
Stephen Hahn wrote:
> * John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-07
> 10:49]:
> > HIGH: All the things needed to make OpenSolaris
>
On 9/7/05, Karyn Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> A few people have responded
I did not see any reply to the issue about X11 in my inbox...
> and I see it at
> http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=12 ...
I was thinking about the mailman list archive (my message was
originally put
A few people have responded and I see it at
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=12 ...
- Karyn
Felix Schulte wrote:
Did anyone got this message? It still does not appear in the
opensolaris-code archive which worries me that noone looks at the
admin stuff of the lists...
---
Did anyone got this message? It still does not appear in the
opensolaris-code archive which worries me that noone looks at the
admin stuff of the lists...
-- Forwarded message --
From: Felix Schulte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sep 7, 2005 7:39 PM
Subject: Re: [osol-discuss] prioritie
* John Plocher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-07 10:49]:
> Karyn Ritter wrote:
> >I've pulled together my preliminary thoughts on the relative priorities
Karyn's complete sentence was precise:
> I've pulled together my preliminary thoughts on the relative
> priorities of open sourcing the ot
Karyn Ritter wrote:
I've pulled together my preliminary thoughts on the relative priorities
From my perspective, the priorities are
HIGH: All the things needed to make OpenSolaris
a bootable, installable and updatable distro.
HIGH: Teamware AS-IS and SCCS, fol
On 9/7/05, Karyn Ritter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I've pulled together my preliminary thoughts on the relative priorities
> of open sourcing the other Solaris consolidations, and would like you
> all to comment on the list and priorities below.
>
> These priorities are not temporally influenced
On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 01:51, Karyn Ritter wrote:
> Consolidation Priority
> --
> Sun Java System Application ServerLOW
Isn't this already open source and under the CDDL license ?
https://glassfish.dev.
* Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2005-09-07 10:27]:
> On Wed, 2005-09-07 at 01:51, Karyn Ritter wrote:
> > Consolidation Priority
> > --
> > Sun Java System Application ServerLOW
>
> Isn't this al
- Original Message -
From: "Karyn Ritter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ben Rockwood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
Sent: Wednesday, September 07, 2005 7:31 AM
Subject: Re: [osol-code] priorities for additional Solaris consolidations
> >
> Good point. Someone within Sun mentioned that as well, a
Ben Rockwood wrote:
I've been waiting for this mail for a long time. :)
I've been meaning to send it for some time...
I agree completely with Cyril, as a storage nut I'd upgrade Network
Storage to HIGH. Leveraging those elements in OpenSolaris can really
help hilite some interesting techno
I've been waiting for this mail for a long time. :)
I agree completely with Cyril, as a storage nut I'd upgrade Network
Storage to HIGH. Leveraging those elements in OpenSolaris can really
help hilite some interesting technology and provide some fun
oppertunities for the project.
(Incident
Do we _really_ need to do that ? I understand the temptation
to reach masses, but that IMHO is a bad practice.
Regards,
Cyril
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
https://opensolaris.org:444/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris
>
> Consolidation Priority
>
> Network Storage MED
In my eyes that should be HIGH.
Regards,
Cyril
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
https://opensola
17 matches
Mail list logo
