> >
> > sch> So... out of every 8 builds, the last two are restricted for
> > sch> stabilization?
> >
> > Works for me.
> >
>
> I like it, if that schedule can be held to from all sides (barring the
> forthcoming releases discussion, obviously).
>
> I'd like to see real input from actual dist
* Mikhail Popov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 12:04]:
> Richard Lowe wrote:
> -
> >
> > "previous releases with complete source encumbrance" is impossible to handle
> > (< 10), for Nevada and above, I can't think of any problem with sustaining
> > gates being available containing the open pa
* Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 10:51]:
> > "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> sch> Sounds fine. Are you talking about the theoretical case when all
> sch> releases under discussion are open development (or at least open
> sch> source), or today's case w
Richard Lowe wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
We've been having serious stability issues with the OpenGrok webapp
serving the OpenSolaris Source Browser
(http://src.opensolaris.org). We started observing the failures
about 2 months ago when we rolled out s
Richard Lowe wrote:
-
>
> "previous releases with complete source encumbrance" is impossible to handle
> (< 10), for Nevada and above, I can't think of any problem with sustaining
> gates being available containing the open parts of the tree, for those parts
> of the source base that are open
On Thu, 11 Jan 2007, Justin Erenkrantz wrote:
> On 1/10/07, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Given a choice, which version of Tomcat would you recommend?
> >
> > We have a commercial application, based on Tomcat, that locks up about
> > every 6 weeks or so. The only clue I've seen, is tha
> "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sch> the coordination Mike is asking for (or asking to persist), if
sch> made formal, requires Sun's sustaining organization to have a
sch> place at a table otherwise only occupied by community members.
That would only be true if I wer
> "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sch> It is not clear to me whether the "open development" versus "open
sch> source" discussion has been had with respect to ongoing
sch> sustaining and maintenance of older releases of the code bases we
sch> have.
I'll agree with t
> "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sch> Sounds fine. Are you talking about the theoretical case when all
sch> releases under discussion are open development (or at least open
sch> source), or today's case where only SMI has a collection of
sch> previous releases?
Nei
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 10:25]:
"sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sch> I'm quite happy with the discussion, although my inclination is
sch> to get the immediate term issue resolved and then spend some time
sch
* Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 10:38]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> >* Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 10:25]:
> >>>"sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>sch> I'm quite happy with the discussion, although my inclination is
> >>sch> to get the immedi
Stephen Hahn wrote:
* Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 10:25]:
"sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sch> I'm quite happy with the discussion, although my inclination is
sch> to get the immediate term issue resolved and then spend some time
sch> thinking about how t
Mike Kupfer wrote:
"sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sch> So... out of every 8 builds, the last two are restricted for
sch> stabilization?
Works for me.
I like it, if that schedule can be held to from all sides (barring the
forthcoming releases discussion, obviously).
* Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 10:25]:
> > "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> sch> I'm quite happy with the discussion, although my inclination is
> sch> to get the immediate term issue resolved and then spend some time
> sch> thinking about how the endg
> "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sch> I'm quite happy with the discussion, although my inclination is
sch> to get the immediate term issue resolved and then spend some time
sch> thinking about how the endgame of a specific release is handled.
For the endgame issue, pl
Stephen Lau wrote:
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
We've been having serious stability issues with the OpenGrok webapp
serving the OpenSolaris Source Browser (http://src.opensolaris.org).
We started observing the failures about 2 months ago when we rolled
out support for indexing a
> "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
sch> So... out of every 8 builds, the last two are restricted for
sch> stabilization?
Works for me.
mike
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensol
Yes, this only effects Mercurial.
Dermot McCluskey wrote:
Steve,
Does this only affect Mercurial? Will SVN support
continue as before?
- Dermot
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
We've been having serious stability issues with the OpenGrok webapp
serving the OpenSolaris Source B
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
We've been having serious stability issues with the OpenGrok webapp
serving the OpenSolaris Source Browser (http://src.opensolaris.org).
We started observing the failures about 2 months ago when we rolled
out support for indexing and searching the Mer
On 1/10/07, Al Hopper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Given a choice, which version of Tomcat would you recommend?
We have a commercial application, based on Tomcat, that locks up about
every 6 weeks or so. The only clue I've seen, is that it fails after we
log the number of bytes read on the socket
Steve,
Does this only affect Mercurial? Will SVN support
continue as before?
- Dermot
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Stephen Lau wrote:
We've been having serious stability issues with the OpenGrok webapp
serving the OpenSolaris Source Browser (http://src.opensolaris.org).
We started observing
John Plocher wrote:
Historically, the PAC chose what kinds of consolidations[*] to charter.
Now the OpenSolaris Community Core members have that responsibility.
This is new ground for all of us (and sometimes it really scares me :-),
so discussions like this are important to make sure we don't sc
Stephen Lau wrote:
We've been having serious stability issues with the OpenGrok webapp
serving the OpenSolaris Source Browser (http://src.opensolaris.org). We
started observing the failures about 2 months ago when we rolled out
support for indexing and searching the Mercurial project repositor
23 matches
Mail list logo
