On 02/28/08 16:12, Garrett D'Amore wrote:
I don't believe that new threads are created, but there are
architecturally no guarantees that one invocation of a timeout function
run on the same thread as another. And on an SMP system, it is entirely
possible for two timeout functions to run at
Mladen Nikitovic wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm wondering about how timeout actually works in practice. I have an
> implementation of a kernel-module and it registers one of it's functions via
> timeout.
>
> The question is whether each invocation of that callout function generates a
> new thread or if
PRDEEP KUMAR wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a problem opening the Solaris Administrator Console from a
> windows machine using the ssh clients.Please help me how
> can I get the dispaly.
>
> My problem is :-
>-I have connected to some solaris system using the vpn from
> windows system
Hi all,
I have a problem opening the Solaris Administrator Console from a windows
machine using the ssh clients.Please help me how
can I get the dispaly.
My problem is :-
-I have connected to some solaris system using the vpn from windows
system through the cygwin/secure crt clients.
"Gavin" == Gavin Maltby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Gavin> The sparc hardware supports 8192 contexts (well the sun4u
Gavin> hardware I know does, not actually sure of the sun4v stuff).
sun4v supports 16-bit contexts, i.e. 65536 contexts, but none of the
released sun4v processors supports more tha
Hi,
I'm wondering about how timeout actually works in practice. I have an
implementation of a kernel-module and it registers one of it's functions via
timeout.
The question is whether each invocation of that callout function generates a
new thread or if is simply a function call?
I have a
Keith M Wesolowski <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 27, 2008 at 11:29:07AM +0100, Joerg Schilling wrote:
>
> > Sgen is not a solution at all as it needs manual confguration.
>
> Actually, that's no longer generally true. HBA drivers that support
> autoenumeration (e.g., mpt) allow sgen to
