> In nss_dbddefs.c at lines 313 and 336 there is the following:
>
> if ((g = (hval & 0xf)) != 0)
>
> the literal has 9 digits but hval is defined as uint32_t. I assume we
> just have one more zero at the end than is absolutely necessary or am I
> missing something important?
Sure
In nss_dbddefs.c at lines 313 and 336 there is the following:
if ((g = (hval & 0xf)) != 0)
the literal has 9 digits but hval is defined as uint32_t. I assume we just have
one more zero at the end than is absolutely necessary or am I missing something
important?
Neale
This message p
Hi!
Please note the _timeout_ is set to 2008-08-25 since we don't have
much time left anymore, after that point the code will move to a
Mercurial tree for final review and integration.
Here comes round "two" of the preliminary code review for the first
update of the ksh93 integration proje
