* Thomas Burgess [2010-02-17 01:09]:
> going back over this, i'm still horribly confusedi'm trying to get it
> installed on another system and i don't know exactly why mine didn't work. I
> had a friend who was able to get it working but i'm not quite sure what i was
> doing wrong. He end
* Thomas Burgess [2010-02-14 21:40]:
> I'm going nuts. I've been trying for a week to get rtorrent working
> in opensolaris. I know it's possible becauuse i've seen others with
> it. I want to get a newer version of rtorrent with xmlrpc-c running
> so i can use it with one of the many web front
* Garrett D'Amore [2009-10-28 17:46]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
>> * Garrett D'Amore [2009-10-28 16:12]:
>>
>>>* containing platform support and drivers not in ON
>>>* drivers might also include userland components (X11 modules?)
>>
>&g
* Garrett D'Amore [2009-10-28 16:12]:
>* containing platform support and drivers not in ON
>* drivers might also include userland components (X11 modules?)
Are these only drivers that have been de-supported, or are you
encouraging new driver development as well?
> 3) Sun would have n
* James Carlson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-09-24 14:19]:
> Jason King writes:
> > The problem is, as far as I can tell, with Indiana (aka OpenSolaris)
> > there's no real concept of a 'full' install. You get a base set of
> > packages, and then install whatever else you want as needed. This
> > ba
* Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-09 10:23]:
> In this example the application launches threads... and by "accident"
> the author has set the limit to (Inf/1.) (=positive Infinite
> dividided by 1 is still infinite... ps... =:-) ) instead of a
> plain value like 64. In this ca
* Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-06-07 01:45]:
> Is anyone here interested to sponsor an ARC case to add a limiter for
> the number of threads to "ulimit" and the matching
> |setrlimit()|+|getrlimit()| system calls ?
You are actually proposing a new resource control, "process.max-lwps".
* vinay simha bn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-31 14:04]:
> i used these command to pull the source from ON Mercurial repository by
>
> #hg clone ssh://[EMAIL PROTECTED]/hg/onnv/onnv-gate
>
>
> it had been 9 hours the shell prompt shows..
>
> destination directory: onnv-gate
> requesting all ch
* Joerg Schilling <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 14:03]:
> Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> while I see this kind of review, it reminds me on recently introduced
> problems with the man pages:
How recently do you mean? Many of the poorly formatted pages have
a
* Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-01-15 05:20]:
> On Jan 14, 2008 12:09 PM, Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Unless there is strong objection, I'll only change dupnode to use a
> list and not change the rest.
Sounds good.
> > 3119 - 3124. How
I think this looks good. Some comments, questions, suggestions
follow.
- Stephen
man.c:
225 - 227. MAN_USAGE lacks mention of "-p".
420,
505,
(Style.) Elide spaces on inside of parentheses:
"( catmando == 0 )" -> "(catmando == 0)", etc. cstyle will warn
* Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-12-20 03:41]:
> Since there are man page changes, I could use some guidance as to how
> I go about getting them in place. Should I be working with the docs
> community and providing diffs to the *roff source? Or is there some
> magic queue that I submit the
* Richard L. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-10-31 19:51]:
> Is there a way to disallow further kernel module load/unload
> operations (including automatic loading of modules) pending (a) reboot
> (for security too), or in a less dire form (b) pending an explicit
> unlock request? (not sure the
* Neale Ferguson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-09-27 20:33]:
> To what component does math.h, iso/math_iso.h etc. belong? They exist
> on a "live" OpenSolaris system in /usr/include but I can't find them
> in the OpenSolaris source tree. There is a math.h but it belongs to
> libbc and doesn't contain t
* Garrett D'Amore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-06-01 20:06]:
> I hope these tools are not the _reason_ that perl was brought into ON.
Nope, it was because customers wanted a bundled Perl with
then-Solaris. Perl's integration (5.8) predates the existence of SFW
(5.9) or Solaris-JDS (5.10) as al
* snow <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-23 23:46]:
> When I use some command within MDB,I got error:
> >::showrev
> mdb:invalid command '::showrev':unknow dcmd name.
::showrev is in both the kvm and proc targets (at least), so I suppose
the next question is: what's the output of ::status? (The a
* De Togni Giacomo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-05-03 16:35]:
> I would to understand if there is a plan to port this C++ wrapper
> under JDS.I think that add C++ capacity to the desktop after C and
> Java could be a good idea and another opportunity for new
> developers.The license seems to be ok,it
* Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 15:19]:
> Mike Kupfer wrote:
> > > "Roland" == Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > Roland> - Should I add support for Mercuial and GIT, too ?
> >
> > As far as patching ON code, we're not planning on using GIT, so I
> > wouldn't bother tr
* Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-04-17 13:29]:
> > "Roland" == Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Roland> - Should I add support for Mercuial and GIT, too ?
>
> As far as patching ON code, we're not planning on using GIT, so I
> wouldn't bother trying to support it. I don't
sumption is to sidle up beside
the existing accounting calls (acct() and exacct_commit_proc() for
processes, term_mstate() for lwps).
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
__
; problems with the poll mechanism on
website-discuss.
- Stephen
[] The "Community Priorities/Polling Test" poll has had its closing time
extended by 48 hours, to 23:59 PDT 13 March.
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blo
rch 8 and closes at 23:59 PDT March 11.
See http://poll.opensolaris.org for status and links to instructions.
Concerns regarding the poll content should be shared on cab-discuss;
problems with the poll mechanism on website-discuss.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris K
re are components implemented in the various suggested
platforms that have "good" attributes--observability, availability,
quality, etc.--that match or exceed those expected in OpenSolaris.
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blog
* Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-03-05 08:52]:
> Matty wrote:
> >Just out of curiosity, is there a reason intrd was written in Perl?
>
> The fellow who wrote it liked perl? poold is written in perl and
> merging was/is anticipated?
>
> Perl wouldn't be my first choice for intrd's imple
* Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-23 16:48]:
> Bonnie Corwin wrote:
> > Bottom line - the project members should make a call.
>
> Do you mean "phone call" ?
>
"make a call" == "make a decision".
(I think it's a use deriving from a referee, who issues his or her
judgement on an a
he cascaded task controls)
> > apply per-user.
>
> This is "future work" or "work we hoped to do at one point but are no
> longer actively pursuing"?
I haven't deleted it from my to-do list for projects. Maybe the zones
guys are interested, since
* Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-20 18:44]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > I would really rather not see the setrlimit(2) emulation in the
> > resource control framework extended.
>
> Why ?
Because the (soft, hard) semantic in the setrlimit emulation code
> for this the task and process limits seem adequate.
>
> But as an administrator, I really would like to have "user.anything"
> type of rctls.
The way we were hoping to do this was to have "wildcard" projects, so
that each user would have a project synthesized aut
(-T) not supported
> process size (kbytes) (-v) unlimited
> -- snip --
I would really rather not see the setrlimit(2) emulation in the
resource control framework extended. Perhaps an OpenSolaris-specific
function in ksh93 to call setrctl(2)
* Danek Duvall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-16 15:48]:
> On Thu, Feb 15, 2007 at 10:49:31AM -0800, Stephen Hahn wrote:
> >
> >A few months back, I asked Sun Legal for a shorter block for CDDL
> >for use in configuration files, style sheets, etc. It looks like
&
f you're interested
in starting on this work, let me know: it has some interfaces that
are ready for publication, it has a few pieces that need work (or
mdb(1) module additions), and it has some stuff that is best ripped
out.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD
ithin ON and similar
consolidations.)
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.ope
* John Zolnowsky x69422/408-404-5064 <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-15 10:35]:
>
> > Date: Thu, 15 Feb 2007 10:27:02 -0800
> > From: Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> > * [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-02-15 09:54]:
> > >
&g
am to tackle
immediately, either technically or in terms of engaging a new Legal
evaluation.) I would suggest filing bugs and assigning them to me, so
we can at least track the worst cases. (Apologies for making that a
Bugster-requiring operati
or opensolaris.org).
I'll start a new thread later today (-code) and we can examine the
shorter block and its applicability.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
be a fun putback for someone to do ;-)
>
> "not it!"
That seems more than fair. Couldn't we make the keywords removal an
incremental process, via one of the code cleanliness filters? (As we
did for the CDDL version change...)
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Ker
his bridge can be burned, the better. :)
(I'd really rather not be singed while converting the freeware source
trees. How about just a "bridge unsafe" sign? :) )
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Micro
* Roland Mainz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-12 01:15]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > but I don't see any point to changing bldenv's default path
> > settings. Can you characterize the problem or problems you see
> > these changes fixing?
>
> If we want
nsolaris-old, once opensolaris-next starts. Such a
transition is a ways off, but it would be best to be prepared.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
* Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 10:51]:
> >>>>> "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> sch> Sounds fine. Are you talking about the theoretical case when all
> sch> releases under discussion are open developm
* Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 10:38]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> >* Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 10:25]:
> >>>>>>>"sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> >>sch> I'm qui
* Mike Kupfer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2007-01-11 10:25]:
> >>>>> "sch" == Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> sch> I'm quite happy with the discussion, although my inclination is
> sch> to get the immediate term issue resol
some methodical way, the various possibilities and make
a set of recommendations. I think this thread shows that there are a
lot of factors to compare for each possible scenario.
So... out of every 8 builds, the last two are restricted for
stab
t is
publishing a Consolidation. (The role of the Governing Board in
coordinating among Community Groups is still to be determined.)
The engineering process wasn't discarded in this transition.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
XPG, and GNU (for
porting/cross-compilation scenarios), but I don't see any point to
changing bldenv's default path settings. Can you characterize the
problem or problems you see these changes fixing?
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsy
were published in June 2005
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=10448&tstart=0
and just today
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread.jspa?threadID=21272&tstart=0
Thanks
Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PRO
hly 5 - 6 open builds followed by 1 - 2 restricted ones.
Thoughts?
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris
* Bart Smaalders <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-12-21 16:57]:
> Project teams sometimes leave alternate targets in place for these
> types of builds. This allows them to debug quickly.
Indeed:
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/usr/src/cmd/sort/Makefile.com
- S.
__
* Stephen Hahn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-09 15:46]:
> It's on the list of things to get fixed in the next 24 hours.
Steve Lau has reindexed the missing consolidations. (Thanks, Steve.)
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[E
* Garrett D'Amore <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-09 15:36]:
> Stephen Hahn wrote:
> > * Aaron Williams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2006-11-09 14:48]:
> >
> >> I am looking for the Solaris 10 kernel source code to help with
> >> implementing a streams dri
ory, so you can't do a pull from our server
today. For the next day or two, you could use the Subversion mirror
at
http://svn.genunix.org/
You can also browse the code using OpenGrok at
http://src.opensolaris.org/source/xref/onnv/onnv-gate/
Apologies
Stephen
--
Stephen
to the changeset history; accordingly, you should export or
otherwise preserve any pending changes in your repositories.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/
ash dumps. See dumpadm(1M), savecore(1M) for
administrative details of configuring crash dumps; see mdb(1) for the
bundled analysis tool (debugger).
There is an MDB community on opensolaris.org:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/mdb/
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel D
//blogs.sun.com/roller/page/sch?entry=progress_in_open_development
and in related processes) revolve around adding a "is this description
useful" feedback mechanism to b.o.o. This mechanism could be used as
the basis for the metric raised in
http://www.opensolaris.org/jive/thread
-d option is
used to identify the device.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-code mailing list
opensolaris-code@opensolaris.org
http://mail.opensolaris.org/mailman/listinfo/opensolaris-code
anybody have an indent recipe, or sed/perl/etc script to re-format
> C code into something which can pass cstyle.pl?
Once upon a time, I found that
indent -br -bs -ce -ci4 -cli0 -d0 -nlp -psl -sc
wasn't too bad. Others may have improvements.
- Stephen
--
l sponsor can help to verify this.
I am uncertain that a sponsor will successfully manage to integrate
this fix. The decision to drop US-I support was made for a complex of
reasons, some business, some legal, and has had various follow-on
effects (like elimination from test farms, among oth
expect. On
> the other hand, I have to wonder if anyone really cares enough to read
> it. What do you think?
I think that showing the tests you considered would be useful to mail
to this alias. As projects in general go, it's strange--I wouldn't
use it as an idealized exam
LOW
> >DEVPROHIGH
> >Documentation: Open Source Solaris Man Pages HIGH
> >Install: Packaging Tools HIGH
> >Networking
> How is this different from what is already there?
This refers to the various SP
he need for opening the source associated with the version
shipped in Solaris is deemed to be small.
- Stephen
--
Stephen Hahn, PhD Solaris Kernel Development, Sun Microsystems
[EMAIL PROTECTED] http://blogs.sun.com/sch/
___
opensolaris-code mailing li
60 matches
Mail list logo
