Re: [osol-code] [Bug 16395] onnv build docs need an update

On Sat, Jun 26, 2010 at 2:17 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote: >> Moved to Bugster: CR 6964464 > > Does this mean I can not add further comments ? Not technically, bugzilla won't prevent you from adding comments. As long as someone reads the bug and takes actions, it's still vaguely usable. So if Mike is

[osol-code] Fwd: [on-discuss] [driver-discuss] "community supported hardware"

On Wed, Oct 28, 2009 at 8:38 PM, Bill Sommerfeld wrote: > Other examples of why a contributor agreement is important: > > Anyone who follows Freenode's #mercurial channel knows that they're > going through a relicensing exercise at the moment, attempting to > contact developers who contributed cod

Re: [osol-code] Patch for CR #6800929 ("snv_106 ksh93 update breaks Install(1M)") and CR #6793120 ("pkill fails on native and sn1 branded zones")

On Thu, Feb 12, 2009 at 2:26 PM, Roland Mainz wrote: > timeless wrote: >> 2009/2/11 Roland Mainz : >> > Index: src/cmd/ksh/builtins/alias.c >> > +/* >> > + * If the requested command is not an alias load it explicitly >> ... >> > + * if an e

Re: [osol-code] Patch for CR #6800929 ("snv_106 ksh93 update breaks Install(1M)") and CR #6793120 ("pkill fails on native and sn1 branded zones")

2009/2/11 Roland Mainz : > Index: src/cmd/ksh/builtins/alias.c > +/* > + * If the requested command is not an alias load it explicitly ... > + * if an executable with the same name sits in a PATH element > + * before /usr/bin (e.g. /usr/xpg4/bin/ls would be executed > + * before /usr/bin/ls if woul

Re: [osol-code] Compiling SUNWgnome-help-viewer

On Wed, Jan 28, 2009 at 8:20 AM, Alexander wrote: > Hello. > I've just compiled and installed SUNWfirefox 3.1 from JDS spec files (trunk > version of 26 January). Now I'm going to compile SUNWgnome-help-viewer. But > during compilation linker says: > > Undefined first refer

Re: [osol-code] [website-discuss] About OpenSolaris Repositories Browser

On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please explain why http it isn't suitable for production use ? fwiw hg's scripts end up being terribly slow. we're suffering from them at mozilla.org http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue1310 https://bugzilla.mozilla

Re: [osol-code] An Additional "Lint" for OpenSolaris - Coverity

Alan Coopersmith wrote: > When I asked the Coverity guys at OSCON last week, they said that it probably > wouldn't be free for us, since they're in the business of selling this > service, > and generally won't be offering free service to projects that are mainly > driven > by a single company whi

Re: [osol-code] Rethinking MANPATH

t their > PATH isn't what they were expecting. "Shawn Walker" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Agreed. > > Personally, I despise info. Give me a man page instead any day. personally i ended up writing pman/plocate; http://timeless.justdave.net/solaris/osol/export/home/tim

Re: [osol-code] Thread balancing

"Thomas De Schampheleire" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: In uts/common/disp/disp.c, above setbackdq() there is this comment: /* * setbackdq() keeps runqs balanced such that the difference in length * between the chosen runq and the next one is no more than RUNQ_MAX_DIFF. * For threads with priori

[osol-code] reading usb code

I'm trying to get usb ethernet working on snv_49, so i was patching and tried to figure out how to do a mapping for certain functions (i figured it out). while following the code, i believe i hit an infinite loop, what am i missing: http://