Re: [osol-code] [website-discuss] About OpenSolaris Repositories Browser

2008-12-03 Thread Gavin Maltby
Darren J Moffat wrote: > I'm not going to log RFE's against OpenGrok because I don't want the > functionality implemented in OpenGrok - IMO it isn't actually missing > those features it is a different beast. > > What we want is plain and simply the http interface to a Mercurial repo. > As i

Re: [osol-code] [website-discuss] About OpenSolaris Repositories Browser

2008-12-02 Thread Darren J Moffat
Alan Burlison wrote: > Darren J Moffat wrote: > >> That wasn't where the thread started and I agree 'hg serv' is not >> suitable for use on the big bad internet. > > Ah, I think the thread was cross-posted half way through, I hadn't seen > the earlier bits on opensolaris-code. > >> That doesn'

Re: [osol-code] [website-discuss] About OpenSolaris Repositories Browser

2008-12-02 Thread Alan Burlison
Darren J Moffat wrote: > That wasn't where the thread started and I agree 'hg serv' is not > suitable for use on the big bad internet. Ah, I think the thread was cross-posted half way through, I hadn't seen the earlier bits on opensolaris-code. > That doesn't mean the web interface to Mercuria

Re: [osol-code] [website-discuss] About OpenSolaris Repositories Browser

2008-12-02 Thread Darren J Moffat
Alan Burlison wrote: > I'm a bit puzzled - I didn't say that 'http wasn't suitable for > production use'. I was talking about 'hg serve', which is what I > assumed was being referred to. That wasn't where the thread started and I agree 'hg serv' is not suitable for use on the big bad internet.

Re: [osol-code] [website-discuss] About OpenSolaris Repositories Browser

2008-12-02 Thread Alan Burlison
I'm a bit puzzled - I didn't say that 'http wasn't suitable for production use'. I was talking about 'hg serve', which is what I assumed was being referred to. We don't just support Mercurial, we also support Subversion, and OpenGrok gives us unified access to both types of repository. If the

Re: [osol-code] [website-discuss] About OpenSolaris Repositories Browser

2008-12-02 Thread timeless
On Tue, Dec 2, 2008 at 1:18 PM, Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Please explain why http it isn't suitable for production use ? fwiw hg's scripts end up being terribly slow. we're suffering from them at mozilla.org http://www.selenic.com/mercurial/bts/issue1310 https://bugzilla.mozilla

Re: [osol-code] [website-discuss] About OpenSolaris Repositories Browser

2008-12-02 Thread Darren J Moffat
Alan Burlison wrote: > Alan Coopersmith wrote: > >>> However, this one doesn't work as good as a real hg web browser. And you >>> can not get all log change history like hg web browser does. > > You can, OpenGrok cprovides history and inter-revision diffs. > >> This is probably a topic for webs

Re: [osol-code] [website-discuss] About OpenSolaris Repositories Browser

2008-12-01 Thread Alan Burlison
Alan Coopersmith wrote: >> However, this one doesn't work as good as a real hg web browser. And you >> can not get all log change history like hg web browser does. You can, OpenGrok cprovides history and inter-revision diffs. > This is probably a topic for website-discuss - I agree it would be