Correction:
On Tue, 2007-05-08 at 17:09 +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
> Garrett D'Amore wrote:
> > Does the HAL run independent of the desktop environment? I've not
> > looked at it, but somehow I was under the impression that the HAL was a
> > gnome-ish thing that got started with the rest of
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
Does the HAL run independent of the desktop environment? I've not
looked at it, but somehow I was under the impression that the HAL was a
gnome-ish thing that got started with the rest of the desktop startup.
YES.
HAL != GNOME
HAL !=> any window system at all.
Likewi
Darren J Moffat wrote:
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
FYI, I've been working with the battery team. I'm hoping to support
battery management on SPARC mobile platforms as well. One of the
consequences of this is that the specific ioctls/kstats/sysevents may
be subject to change in the future. I woul
Garrett D'Amore wrote:
FYI, I've been working with the battery team. I'm hoping to support
battery management on SPARC mobile platforms as well. One of the
consequences of this is that the specific ioctls/kstats/sysevents may be
subject to change in the future. I wouldn't start depending on
FYI, I've been working with the battery team. I'm hoping to support
battery management on SPARC mobile platforms as well. One of the
consequences of this is that the specific ioctls/kstats/sysevents may be
subject to change in the future. I wouldn't start depending on them,
just yet. :-) Th
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
BTW: could you point me to the new program?
The new stuff integrated into ONNV 63
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/flag-days/pages/2007041401/
Unfortunately, I cannot see any CLI program that supports the battery.
Unf
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > BTW: could you point me to the new program?
>
> The new stuff integrated into ONNV 63
>
> http://opensolaris.org/os/community/on/flag-days/pages/2007041401/
Unfortunately, I cannot see any CLI program that supports the battery.
This looks like a bug
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Joerg Schilling wrote:
I am trying this a second time as I did not receive any
reply. I did enhance batstat again
Try the laptop community which is where batstat lives.
batstat is effectively EOF (my personal opinion anywa
Darren J Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Joerg Schilling wrote:
> > I am trying this a second time as I did not receive any
> > reply. I did enhance batstat again
>
> Try the laptop community which is where batstat lives.
>
> batstat is effectively EOF (my personal opinion anyway but I'm
Joerg Schilling wrote:
I am trying this a second time as I did not receive any
reply. I did enhance batstat again
Try the laptop community which is where batstat lives.
batstat is effectively EOF (my personal opinion anyway but I'm fairly
sure Casper would agree) now since we have battery
I am trying this a second time as I did not receive any
reply. I did enhance batstat again
The source is at:
ftp://ftp.berlios.de/pub/schily/
Here is the extended output:
batstat -v
System is currently on AC power
System temperature = 44.0C
battery 0
bif_unit = 0
bif_design
Here is some enhancements to batstat.c that
add the standard usage() and that allows to better understand
the -v output. It now gives also Watthours, Volts and Amperes.
--- batstat.corig Fri Oct 21 13:34:13 2005
+++ batstat.c Tue May 1 14:24:40 2007
@@ -173,6 +173,25 @@
12 matches
Mail list logo
