Re: [osol-code] Library Question

2005-07-26 Thread Rod Evans
Shawn Walker wrote: The question then is whether or not there is any continued point in setting the executable bit? I mean, why bother setting it if it's unnecessary? On the chance that some ancient ye olde customer software will break? Not that it really matters, just curious :) I trawled

Re: [osol-code] Library Question

2005-07-26 Thread Rod Evans
Peter Memishian wrote: > I've always wondered...why are shared libraries installed under *NIX > operating systems with the executable bit set? They seem to work > regardless of whether the bit is set or not. I'm sure there's > something I'm missing, but after a few hours of searching I can't

Re: [osol-code] Library Question

2005-07-26 Thread Shawn Walker
On 7/26/05, Rod Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Shawn Walker wrote: > > > The question then is whether or not there is any continued point in > > setting the executable bit? I mean, why bother setting it if it's > > unnecessary? On the chance that some ancient ye olde customer software > > will

Re: [osol-code] Library Question

2005-07-25 Thread Shawn Walker
For those that couldn't see Rod's great explanation (I'm guessing his CC to the list bounced): -- Forwarded message -- From: Rod Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Date: Jul 24, 2005 9:45 PM Subject: Re: [osol-code] Library Question To: Peter Memishian <[EMAIL PROT

Re: [osol-code] Library Question

2005-07-25 Thread Paul Durrant
On 25 Jul 2005, at 01:04, Peter Memishian wrote: an excellent question -- and to add insult to injury, attempting to execute them is far from pretty: $ /lib/libc.so usage: ld.so.1 [-e option,...] dynamic-object [object args,...] Killed $ /lib/libnsl.so Illegal Instruction (core dumped)

Re: [osol-code] Library Question

2005-07-24 Thread Shawn Walker
On 7/24/05, Rod Evans <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Peter Memishian wrote: > > > I've always wondered...why are shared libraries installed under *NIX > > > operating systems with the executable bit set? They seem to work > > > regardless of whether the bit is set or not. I'm sure there's > > > s

re: [osol-code] Library Question

2005-07-24 Thread Peter Memishian
> I've always wondered...why are shared libraries installed under *NIX > operating systems with the executable bit set? They seem to work > regardless of whether the bit is set or not. I'm sure there's > something I'm missing, but after a few hours of searching I can't seem > to find why. an

[osol-code] Library Question

2005-07-24 Thread Shawn Walker
I've always wondered...why are shared libraries installed under *NIX operating systems with the executable bit set? They seem to work regardless of whether the bit is set or not. I'm sure there's something I'm missing, but after a few hours of searching I can't seem to find why. Responses apprecia