Richard L. Hamilton wrote:
A way to get df to not show all the rest of the pseudo filesystems without
their own storage
would make the output a lot easier to read (esp. not showing lofs mounts, since
they tend
to be rather long and not format nicely). At present, that would be at least:
ctfs
On 5/2/07, Mike Gerdts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/1/07, Richard L. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone see my point about decluttering df, and maybe about the latter
approach being the
> cleanest? If so, what would be the best strategy for RFEs/ARC cases: one,
two, or fully
Mike Gerdts wrote:
I think that it is something that should be done. The ignore option
sounds reasonable to me, although from a generic standpoint I am not
sure what "ignore" really means as a mount option. Maybe the right
option is "pseudo" or "nospace" but the general approach and intended
ou
On 5/1/07, Richard L. Hamilton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Does anyone see my point about decluttering df, and maybe about the latter
approach being the
cleanest? If so, what would be the best strategy for RFEs/ARC cases: one, two,
or fully broken
out? More to the point, any _objections to tha
I tried this conversation once here or on c.u.s some time ago, and don't recall
getting a consensus,
so I think I'll try again.
I for one find it very annoying that there's no way to exclude from df output
all those filesystems
that do not represent real real storage (optionally together with ex
