Re: [osol-discuss] Dumb Question Time

2005-08-20 Thread Alan Coopersmith
James G. Stallings II wrote: All that aside, I'm preparing to evaluate opensolaris on an intel box, and have a few goofy questions that I haven't been able to gather from the faq or from searching this list: One important point is that OpenSolaris is just a set of source code at this point.

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: GPL CDDL - incompatibitile., what does this mean? (round 3)

2005-08-20 Thread Stefan Teleman
On 8/19/05, Robert W. Fuller [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Nobody was suggesting that Open Solaris go GPL, merely that the license be modified to be GPL compatible. Would it be too much to kindly ask the FSF to consider amending the GPL (in light of the forthcoming GPL V3) to allow compatibility

Re: [osol-discuss] Dumb Question Time

2005-08-20 Thread Al Hopper
On Sat, 20 Aug 2005, Alan Coopersmith wrote: James G. Stallings II wrote: All that aside, I'm preparing to evaluate opensolaris on an intel box, and have a few goofy questions that I haven't been able to gather from the faq or from searching this list: One important point is that

[osol-discuss] Solaris Express ISO images

2005-08-20 Thread James C. Cotillier
As of today at least, the Solaris Express - Community Release web page is serving the files `sol-nv-b18-platform-v{1234}-iso.zip'. But SX b19 and b20 have apparently already been distributed via this same web page in previous days or weeks. (I'm referring here only to the Solaris Express

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: GPL CDDL - incompatibitile., what does this mean? (round 3)

2005-08-20 Thread Rich Teer
On Fri, 19 Aug 2005, Robert W. Fuller wrote: Shawn Walker wrote: If opensolaris ever went GPL, I'd be gone in an instant, and I suspect others would as well. Because at that point, it would become useless Nobody was suggesting that Open Solaris go GPL, merely that the license be modified

[osol-discuss] Re: Re: GPL CDDL - incompatibitile., what does this mean? (round 3)

2005-08-20 Thread michael wolfe
it really does not make any difference about all the fine points about if it is GPL or CDDL. the bottom line is that opensource devlopers and users want their software to be GPL. if it is not then these people will be turned off by opensolaris. opensolaris would benefit greatly from having a

[osol-discuss] Re: Solaris Companion community development

2005-08-20 Thread TJ Yang
Steve I like to invite you take a look at TWW's opensource package offering. I believe it is a superset of Solaris Companion packages and it is GNU opensourced. ftp://support.thewrittenword.com/dists/7.1/src/ All of your three conerns has been addressed by TWW's Hyper Package Management

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: new community for Chinese users

2005-08-20 Thread James Lick
W. Wayne Liauh wrote: Sun has recently started a Student Developer Program in Taiwan. Basically, it says that (in traditional Chinese, I am not going to translate it): (in some more detail): Students in Taiwan will be able to get a free license to a suite of developer software

Re: [osol-discuss] Re: Re: GPL CDDL - incompatibitile., what does this mean? (round 3)

2005-08-20 Thread James Lick
michael wolfe wrote: it really does not make any difference about all the fine points about if it is GPL or CDDL. the bottom line is that opensource devlopers and users want their software to be GPL. if it is not then these people will be turned off by opensolaris. I cannot agree with