I don't know the answer about redistributing libC* but have you brought up the
DLJ question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the appropriate forum
http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=94
I'll make some inqueries myself but the DLJ folks might know the answer and
certainly would want to know
Just quickly:
I got a few questions;
1.) Is the 'priocntl' utility used instead of the
'nice' utility, or is it just another priority tool?
I got the feeling it's the same as 'nice'
Already well answered by others.
2.) Is Dynamic System Domains the same as zones? The
description
David Comay wrote:
I don't know the answer about redistributing libC* but have you brought up the
DLJ question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the appropriate forum
http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=94
I'll make some inqueries myself but the DLJ folks might know the answer and
certainly
Martin Bochnig wrote:
PLUS: Even the since then *holy* and completely unavailable OpenBootProm
ieee1275 firmware is open source (BSD license ! ) since last week.
All that is totally _GREAT_.
Should read: Even the until then *holy* and completely unavailable
OpenBootProm ieee1275 firmware
Martin Bochnig wrote:
David Comay wrote:
I don't know the answer about redistributing libC* but have you brought up the
DLJ question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the appropriate forum
http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=94
I'll make some inqueries myself but the DLJ folks might
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
David Comay wrote:
I don't know the answer about redistributing libC* but have you
brought up the DLJ question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the appropriate
forum
http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=94
I'll make some inqueries myself but the
James C. McPherson wrote:
Moinak Ghosh wrote:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
David Comay wrote:
I don't know the answer about redistributing libC* but have you
brought up the DLJ question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the
appropriate forum
http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=94
I'll make
On 09/07/06 01:20, Joerg Schilling wrote:
John Plocher [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Can we please go back to discussing more productive topics?
If you have time to do more productive work and are interested in doing so, you
could
help to finally integrate star into opensolaris.
I'm not sure
But what if an application has memory limit and fills the limited memory with
memory leaks, then when the memory limit is reached it cannot allocate memory
for its own actual behavior, which leads to starvation of itself?
Can this happen?
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Joerg Schilling wrote:
Martin Bochnig [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Certainly very useful!
However SUNW, what about allowing Schillix, Belenix and marTux the
(closed) redistribution of the 4 tiny libs, on whom your so called
Distro-JDK __depends__ ?
You youself violate DLJ's terms requiring
Mike Kupfer [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Jörg == Joerg Schilling [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Jörg as it seems that real work is done with ksh93 integration after a
Jörg maling list and a project hast bee created, I propose to create
Jörg something similar for star.
Just so everyone knows, Jörg
Gavin Maltby [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'm not sure I understand how we got on to mention 'star' in this thread,
but let's just say we all knew it was inevitable :-)
There is a simple way to avoid this kind of hints:
Make sure that people from Sun do not tell me that _I_ am preventing
real
The next meeting of the Atlanta OpenSolaris User Group will be Tuesday,
Sept 12, at 7 PM in the offices of Sun Microsystems. Sun is located at
3655 North Point Parkway in Alpharetta, GA. For directions and details,
see the ATLOSUG web site at
RVCE, Bangalore Computer science department is organizing a 2 day tech fest -
IOTA 2006, on the 29th and 30th September 2006 in which more than 3000
students from various colleges are expected to participate.
IOTA 2006 is sponsored by SPICE Telecom Ltd. and other companies like TISCO and
NOVELL
hi,
I need some driver for opensolaris or belenix that do not exist currently...
but if wmware esx abstract the hardware and has support for raid card (esx is a
linux layer). what does the Solaris Guru think?
I really want to use ZFS, and want a dedicated NAS running Solaris
...
This
The T10 SCSI OSD specification defines a command protocol that allows data to be
stored and managed as logical objects rather than as blocks of data. We would
like to propose an opensolaris project to provide support in Solaris for OSD
devices. This will consist of the utilities, programming
On Thu, Sep 07, 2006 at 11:21:01AM +0100, Darren J Moffat wrote:
This is indeed something that could be fixed by Sun easily.
My impression is that this is caused by selective perception at Suns side.
Sun people do not have this problem.
this, together with
more likely lack of resources or
Ed Nadolski wrote:
The T10 SCSI OSD specification defines a command protocol that allows
data to be stored and managed as logical objects rather than as blocks
of data. We would like to propose an opensolaris project to provide
support in Solaris for OSD devices. This will consist of the
James Carlson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Joerg Schilling writes:
Maybe, it was the same reason, why I did not get an answer on the
question why something simple like fnmatch.c from libc is still not
available as source.
It is (like all of the special libc i18n code) encumbered. This is
Joerg Schilling writes:
Running nm on the .o file makes me asume that it simply calls i8n code
but is not itself encumbered. Could you check this please?
I think that's flawed. There is no way to determine what licenses may
or may not apply to a given bit of source code by looking at the
The core problem appears to be that Joerg did not get a response at all.
With regard to this comment in an earlier post:
Maybe, it was the same reason, why I did not get an answer on the
question why something simple like fnmatch.c from libc is still not
available as source.
a boilerplate
a boilerplate response could have been made, of the form
Inert name(s) [is |are] entwined with encumbered code, and certain
agreements are in place that
would be repudiated if Sun were to discuss any instant details in a public
forum
We're not allowed to name and shame.
So that's all we can
On 9/7/06, Ed Nadolski [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
The T10 SCSI OSD specification defines a command protocol that allows data to be
stored and managed as logical objects rather than as blocks of data. We would
like to propose an opensolaris project to provide support in Solaris for OSD
devices.
Recently, Glynn Foster wrote:
Subject: OpenSolaris Weekly News #27
Adding opensolaris-announce to send these weekly summaries there, as well
as -discuss. All follow ups should be to -discuss.
Ditto for these reports. --Eric
[b]As an aside:[/b]
I think that's flawed. There is no way to determine
what licenses may
or may not apply to a given bit of source code by
looking at the
object file produced.
This may be true for Sun for Solaris, and true for other UNIX
vendors generally, but it is not universally
Cyril Plisko writes:
The T10 OSD model provides a number of advantages over the aging block-based
storage model in areas such as performance, scalability, and security.
Storage
vendors are currently developing storage devices that support the T10 OSD
protocol, and OSD support for other
James C. Cotillier writes:
This may be true for Sun for Solaris, and true for other UNIX
vendors generally, but it is not universally so.
Another large vendor, in a very large OS, has since 1964 had
the standard of placing such information in human-readable
characters at the start of every
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, James Carlson wrote:
In other words, if you want the answer as to what the specific
restriction might be, I'm afraid we can't divulge that, and even if we
could, it likely would do you no amount of good. Can't is all we
can say.
One wonders at the stupidity of companies
Rich Teer writes:
If the original writer of the code doesn't want their code released,
that's their right and that's OK, but it would sure be nice if they
would allow their identity and reasons to be known. After all, what
have they got to lose? Their code is still kept secret.
Welcome to
We're not allowed to name and shame.
I meant just the name of an object, assuming a question had come in
of the form What is the status of frizzlefraggle.c? kind of thing.
Of course you could not reveal the names of any third party entities
in agreements with Sun.
But the CDDL response does
Thanks for the detailed info.
If v9 infact represents 64-bit then why am I getting 32bit/64bit compilation
conflicts. MySQL config shows that it is compiled with the v9 flag and from
what I understand by default the compiler will compile in 64bit (the native
architecture, right?)
I will post
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, James Carlson wrote:
Welcome to the world of contracts.
I'm not saying I'm thrilled with the answer, but just that there isn't
another one. No matter how urgently or nicely you ask. :-/
Indeed. :-(
A productive place to take this conversation would be a proposal to
Thanks for the detailed info.
If v9 infact represents 64-bit then why am I getting 32bit/64bit compilation
conflicts. MySQL conf
ig shows that it is compiled with the v9 flag and from what I understand by
default the compiler wi
ll compile in 64bit (the native architecture, right?)
Default
Moinak Ghosh wrote On 09/07/06 01:32,:
Martin Bochnig wrote:
David Comay wrote:
I don't know the answer about redistributing libC* but have you brought up
the DLJ question to [EMAIL PROTECTED] or the appropriate forum
http://forums.java.net/jive/forum.jspa?forumID=94
I'll make some
Rich Teer wrote:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, James Carlson wrote:
Welcome to the world of contracts.
I'm not saying I'm thrilled with the answer, but just that there isn't
another one. No matter how urgently or nicely you ask. :-/
Indeed. :-(
A productive place to take this conversation would be a
Rich Teer wrote:
On Thu, 7 Sep 2006, James Carlson wrote:
...
not encumbered. I can't ... but perhaps there's someone interested
who can.
Why can't you make such a proposal?* You (and all other Sun engineers)
are just as much of our community as anyone else, so in principle there
should be
Yes, but that's really no different than without limits,
as if you did not set a limit but just wait a little longer
it will reach the real system limits, and have the same
problem, but there'll be less you can do about it.
The difference is how much this affects other processes.
There's
Sure; I've seen such a thing done before. However,
it doesn't work
with the objects in question and, even if it did, it
turns out that we
can't put much more here than sorry, but source for
this module isn't
and can't be made available.
... which turns out to be exactly the same thing
If the original writer of the code doesn't want their
code released,
that's their right and that's OK, but it would sure
be nice if they
would allow their identity and reasons to be known.
After all, what
ave they got to lose? Their code is still kept
secret.
Here I would have to weigh
I believe I have a working scratch install of S10u2 on my new server
box, but when I boot it, after relatively few seconds I get a message
on the screen that X login screen is coming and I should wait for it.
Then the screen blanks, and I cannot talk to the system through the
keyboard again. I
On 9/7/06, Dennis Clarke [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
There is a new release of VMWare Workstation out.
VMware Workstation 5.5.2
Latest Version: 5.5.2 | 8/10/06 | Build 29772
Anyone done any testing with snv_46 yet?
i have booted b46 that was part of a opensolaris distro i beleve
inside of
I remember when ssh appeared in the early builds of Solaris 9 and I was
pretty happy about that. There are definitely differences between the
OpenSSH and the SunSSH code bases. The three things I point out as show
stoppers for anyone trying to shoe horn OpenSSH into Solaris are:
- PAM
Hi Stuart!
On 07/09/2006, at 4:22 PM, Stuart Remphrey wrote:
3.) What's the actual difference between changing
user priority and global priority? What happends if I
change both to maximum (say RT). Is the user priority
less worth the global? If I as root change the user
priority, is there any
I'm the responsible engineer for the e1000g driver. And we have been aware of
this
issue. Currently this problem is still under investigation. I'll get the fix
soon.
And I'll send you the fixed driver at that time.
I'll keep you tuned.
Thanks,
Ted
This message posted from opensolaris.org
44 matches
Mail list logo
