Hi There,
My Solaris installation takes a long time to shut down (it seems to be
inordinately long).
Here's what I do:
1. Log in as myself
2. su -
3. shutdown -g0 -i5 -y
X stops almost straight away and then my machine just does nothing.
Eventually, I'm told that the CDE Login service
Wake on LAN is in my view going to be tough to push as an RFE because the
intended use case is radically different from the core customer base -- which
are customers running high availability / mission critical servers 24x7x365.
Most likely WOL capability will have to be done entirely by an
Felix Schulte wrote:
Tell that Sun. They are still proud to deliver their broken ksh88 junk
with Solaris and claim that this is in the best interest of their
customers
Pride has nothing to do with it, not that it matters to someone like
you who is just interested in flaming and slowing down
UNIX admin wrote:
Wake on LAN is in my view going to be tough to push as an RFE because the
intended use case is radically different from the core customer base -- which
are customers running high availability / mission critical servers 24x7x365.
Most likely WOL capability will have to be
Finally skipped nge0, but it took a lot longer than I normally expect. I also
realized that the other timers didn't seem to be running normal speed.
However, I'm now into the installation and most everything seems to be defined
correctly. It's actually installing, and I hope I didn't screw up
I totally understand. The problem is that open sourcing existing
proprietary code requires work, specifically legal work. Given our
priorities and resources, it's difficult to justify spending time and
money on old code, but I'll ask..
Rich Teer wrote:
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Stephen
UNIX admin wrote:
Wake on LAN is in my view going to be tough to push as an RFE because the
intended use case is radically different from the core customer base -- which
are customers running high availability / mission critical servers 24x7x365.
Wake on LAN for x86 machines is being done by
One of the main benefits of open source is to encourage folks to develop
support for obscure or obsolete equipment. So yes, we strongly
encourage the community to port older drivers to X.org. If you want to
include those in opensolaris.org, that's relatively easy to do as well.
We, Sun, are
Will Solaris 11 support my printer? What about Solaris Express? Are there any new projects that currently support my printer? I have a HP DeskJet722C that does not work on Solaris 10 x86. Thank you.
On 9/12/06, Norm Jacobs [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
PPD files delivered in SUNW* packages should be
The pnm2ppa driver is not currently shipping in Solaris, but assuming
there are no legal issues (license, patent, ...), I'm sure that it can
be added. If you are interested in working on getting it into Solaris,
I would be happy to help you. Otherwise, I will add it to my growing
list of things
On Tue, 31 Oct 2006, Stephen Harpster wrote:
One of the main benefits of open source is to encourage folks to develop
support for obscure or obsolete equipment. So yes, we strongly encourage the
community to port older drivers to X.org. If you want to include those in
opensolaris.org,
On 31 Oct 2006 11:59:59 -0500 (EST), Dave Morano [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Stephan Titard wrote:
on cygwin, ksh93r does 500 iterations in 1.73s (1.06s with no field
splitting), pdksh in 2.06s(1.8s) and bash
in 18.23s(4.7s)
on HP-UX 11.00 the system ksh (Version 11/16/88) runs about 10 times
Rather than continuing to reply to myself and filling people's mailboxes,
please check out http://lopsa.org/blog/2 (I got nv 50 up, graphics work, nge
works).
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
Tried booting standard nevada 50 install media. Same asy0 errors, get to the
point of choosing in
stall method. Choose Interactive (default), starts RPC, then sits forever
trying to configure nge0
.
We see the asy0 problems a lot with Toshiba laptops; I think changing
to either config all
Thanks, Bonnie. Your project proposal has seconds. I'll contact you
offline to get you set up.
Eric
On Fri, 27 Oct 2006, Bonnie Corwin wrote:
I propose the 'ON Tool Hg Conversion' project to convert the ON
tools that currently have knowledge of TeamWare and/or SCCS
to work with Mercurial.
The
Felix Schulte wrote:
On 31 Oct 2006 11:59:59 -0500 (EST), Dave Morano [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Stephan Titard wrote:
on cygwin, ksh93r does 500 iterations in 1.73s (1.06s with no field
splitting), pdksh in 2.06s(1.8s) and bash
in 18.23s(4.7s)
on HP-UX 11.00 the system ksh (Version
Wake on LAN is in my view going to be tough to push
as an RFE because the intended use case is radically
different from the core customer base -- which are
customers running high availability / mission
critical servers 24x7x365.
Most likely WOL capability will have to be done
entirely by
Hi,
I've been trying to graph context switches and interrupts on a quad
Opteron running 6/06 and getting weird results. For example, doing
successive gets for the ssRawContexts OID (.1.3.6.1.4.1.2021.11.60.0):
SNMPv2-SMI::enterprises.2021.11.60.0 = Counter32: 139746744
As to the File Transfer Failed error, following steps might be a solution to
resolve it:
(1) Open a terminal and run the following command:
# javaws
And then a window of Java Application Cache Reviewer will display.
(2) Choose the menu Edit - Preferences...
And then a window of
Ignacio Marambio Catán wrote On 10/30/06 22:43,:
+1
can we do this as a wiki? that should lower the entry barrier for
contributors
Hi ... The site infrastructure will stay as it is for these portals and
will be managed from a technical perspective just as the main site is.
Each portal
UNIX admin wrote:
Wake on LAN is in my view going to be tough to push
as an RFE because the intended use case is radically
different from the core customer base -- which are
customers running high availability / mission
critical servers 24x7x365.
Wake on LAN for x86 machines is being
Joey Guo wrote On 10/31/06 01:26,:
+1
My pleasure to bring up cn.opensolaris.org in China.
Excellent! I sort of expected that China would be a big part of this
project. Welcome! You guys are leaving everyone in the dust with your
OpenSolaris university program, so having a Chinese
Venky wrote On 10/31/06 16:33,:
+1
Thanks!
can we do this as a wiki? that should lower the entry barrier for
contributors
A huge +1 to that! :)
Sorry, I don't have wiki to offer. But I hope you get involved anyway.
Having the site in multiple language could change the dynamic of the
23 matches
Mail list logo
