hey ...
Here are some pics from OpenSolaris Day in Korea yesterday:
http://blogs.sun.com/jimgris/entry/opensolaris_in_korea_142_photos
Check the OpenSolaris World Tour schedule for a date in your area:
http://opensolaris.org/os/community/marketing/events/techdays/
Also, if you are interested in
Project Proposal: Multi-lingual Technology Glossary
I propose a project on OpenSolaris.org for the development of multilingual
technology glossary. By glossary, I mean a collection of terms and the
definitions. IMHO, this project brings several advantages to the success of
OS.o community.
A go
Josh Hurst wrote:
Could the mail receiver changed to do a weak matching of names, e.g. a
mail send to [EMAIL PROTECTED] gets forwarded to
[EMAIL PROTECTED] if there is only one match?
Why not just add the list names you want to post to to your e-mail
client's address book? Posting to the ac
ThanksThat is what I thought but wanted to confirm.
null
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
>I am currently testing OpenSolaris snv_38(aka - Solaris 11, SunOS 5.11). What
>is the process for
patch support? I have a sunsolve account but at this time I don't see any
information on patch sup
port.
There are no patches for OpenSolaris/Nevada.
OpenSolaris is "just the source"; Nevada
Hi All,
I am currently testing OpenSolaris snv_38(aka - Solaris 11, SunOS 5.11). What
is the process for patch support? I have a sunsolve account but at this time I
don't see any information on patch support.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
I propose creation of an OpenSolaris Migration Tools project for the Immigrants
Community.
The goal of this project is to provide a central location for a growing source
code repository of generic tools and associated documentation, designed to ease
/ automate the various tasks involved in port
I recall there were instructions on either this forum or another on this site
for how to get SMC working again on recent builds of Solaris Express.
Unfortunately my searches haven't turned up anything. Can someone possibly
remind me?
Thanks
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
Perhaps virturalization is the way to go even for desktops. I am not trying to
read too much into it, but does the following announcement give any hint that
we may see VMWare host for Solaris soon?
http://www.eseminarslive.com/article2/0,2144,2028824,00.asp
(a virturalization seminar to be joi
Hi,
I've been rummaging thru the OpenSolaris source repo and I've found the code
for the SATA drivers and the ATA i/o subsystem. Could these be compiled for
Solaris 8/9 (x86 and SPARC) to extend the life of the OS's that Sun forgot?
Thanks,
jsims2359
This message posted from opensolaris.or
On 11/8/06, Rich Teer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Josh Hurst wrote:
> Why have all lists at opensolaris.org a -discuss ending? Its confusing.
They're not, hence opensolaris-code et al. The -discuss lists are
intended for general discussion about the bit before the "-", so
zf
I have installed correctly rrdtools and in the clients only is running gmond
but the problem persist. I only got up some machines but the others are
"down". Also, my graphics continue empty. Here are my gmond (same in both,
server and clients) and gmetad
gmond
/* This configuration is as
J?rgen Keil stated:
< > After I installed WinXP/SP2 onto an Asus M2N Delux
< > machine (with nVidia 570 chipset, including two MCP55
< > NICs) & rebooted back to SX44, the NIC immediately
< > stopped working.
<
< Maybe I've observed something similar.
<
< Is there a constant stream of "link down
> Usually its not pxe boot first I think.. PXE boot
> first and you would see
> the pxe sending out DHCP requests, and on the screen
> would be like:
> DHCP.../
> where the '/' is a dial, /-\|...
> But if it is on your box then a workaround woud be
> to set the pxe boot below
> cdrom and dis
Precisely what I was thinking. Except that third column is "swapped out
processes" and how does one pull them back from the brink of never never
land? What ladel reaches into that bucket and when?
I don't rightly know.
Lets run through a thought experiment/demonstration:
Start off with a
> After I installed WinXP/SP2 onto an Asus M2N Delux
> machine (with nVidia 570 chipset, including two MCP55
> NICs) & rebooted back to SX44, the NIC immediately
> stopped working.
Maybe I've observed something similar.
Is there a constant stream of "link down" followed by "link up" messages
for
W. Wayne Liauh stated:
< > Almost. We encountered a similar problem with the
< > nvidia nics.
< > Theres a fix incoming to nevada any day now, its
< > just going thru the
< > process of getting in.
<
< > quick query, whats the boot order on your box ?
< > Its not pxe boot then
< > cdrom then
> Almost. We encountered a similar problem with the
> nvidia nics.
> Theres a fix incoming to nevada any day now, its
> just going thru the
> process of getting in.
> quick query, whats the boot order on your box ?
> Its not pxe boot then
> cdrom then disk ?
> Regards,
> Sean.
> .
I suppos
Dennis Clarke wrote:
man what ?
bash-3.00$ uname -a
SunOS phobos 5.11 snv_49 i86pc i386 i86pc
bash-3.00$ cat /etc/release
Solaris Nevada snv_49 X86
Copyright 2006 Sun Microsystems, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Use is subject to licen
W. Wayne Liauh stated:
< > Is there any way to cause Solaris to also write to
< > (i.e., flush) this RAM, similar to what Fedora Core
< > are doing? Thanks.
<
< This problem has been solved in the 2.6.18 Linux kernel (the "forcedeth"
module will now reset the NIC cache). This explains why Fedor
> Is there any way to cause Solaris to also write to
> (i.e., flush) this RAM, similar to what Fedora Core
> are doing? Thanks.
This problem has been solved in the 2.6.18 Linux kernel (the "forcedeth" module
will now reset the NIC cache). This explains why Fedora Core 6 (2.6.8 kernel)
has no p
> On 09/11/2006, at 11:36 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> You see that? I had a maximum of 34 threads in the run queue.
>>
>> But I have hundreds of tasks to run and they are all low priority
>> fixed
>> class processes.
>
> According to Section 2.8 of Solaris Performance and Tools the run
> queue va
On Thu, 2006-11-09 at 10:08 -0500, Dennis Clarke wrote:
> > Dennis Clarke wrote:
> >> How does Solaris load up its tasks and know when to say "stop, no more
> >> please"?
> >>
>
> >>
> > I agree that Solaris will continue to take on the abuse,
> > It doesn't seem to keel over as quickly as linux d
> I don't know exactly what means "This RRD was created
> on other architecture" because as I know, I compiled
> the rrdtool following the instructions on
> http://apstc.sun.com.sg/downloads/s10/README/rrdtool-1
> .2.11-sol10-x86.txt
Is there a particular reason why you didn't just use the docs he
I have the same motherboard and would *really* like to get the audio working.
I've tried everything mentioned in this thread but no joy :(
Does anyone have any ideas on how to get this working?
Thanks,
Tom
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> You could posibly throttle the process with /etc/project map entry
> and the right schedulinig/dispatch method. man dispadm.
>
> This was formerly known as Solaris Resource Manager SRM.
>
found it ... you mean these puppies ?
http://www.blastwave.org/man/dispadmin_1M.html
http://www.
> Dennis Clarke wrote:
>> How does Solaris load up its tasks and know when to say "stop, no more
>> please"?
>>
>>
> I agree that Solaris will continue to take on the abuse,
> It doesn't seem to keel over as quickly as linux distros.
>
> You could posibly throttle the process with /etc/project ma
> On Wed, 8 Nov 2006, Dennis Clarke wrote:
>
>> resources at hand. They do a very fine job of totally protecting me from
>> such obscenities as :
>>
>> :(){ :|:& }; :
>>
>> When presented to the bash shell that seems to really upset the system.
>> IT
>> will completely crash a Red Hat Enterprise
On 09/11/2006, at 11:36 AM, Dennis Clarke wrote:
You see that? I had a maximum of 34 threads in the run queue.
But I have hundreds of tasks to run and they are all low priority
fixed
class processes.
According to Section 2.8 of Solaris Performance and Tools the run
queue value in vmstat
Since POSIX (or at any rate, SUSv3) seems to require that close()
release all locks held by the process on that file (not just those
obtained via that file descriptor), is there a need for an alternate
version of close() (call it close2() or close_nounlock() or whatever)
that doesn't release the l
> After I installed WinXP/SP2 onto an Asus M2N Delux
> machine (with nVidia 570 chipset, including two MCP55
> NICs) & rebooted back to SX44, the NIC immediately
> stopped working. The same problem happend to SuSE
> 10.0 & 10.1.
>
> However, WinXP/SP2 does not affect Fedora Core 6. In
> fact, af
31 matches
Mail list logo
