Frank,
How did you think it's calling pthread_mutex_lock(NULL), but no other e.g.
pthread_mutex_lock("invalid address, e.g. 0xf)?
I think the NULL pointer into pthread_mutex_lock is not accordant with signal
SEGV (access to address exceeded protections).
BR,
Eric
This message
>
>> So what happens if I pull out a drive from my SPARC based
>> solaris 8 system and plug it into a intel box...
>
>
> Solaris-SPARC uses a different disk TOC than Solaris-x86.
>
here is a source bit that seems to indicate where the difference lay.
from /usr/src/cmd/fmthard/fmthard.c slightly
>
>> So what happens if I pull out a drive from my SPARC based
>> solaris 8 system and plug it into a intel box...
>
>
> Solaris-SPARC uses a different disk TOC than Solaris-x86.
>
> X86 disks use a disk label that is derived from the PC world,
> with Master Boot Records, fdisk, partitions and the
So what happens if I pull out a drive from my SPARC based
solaris 8 system and plug it into a intel box...
Solaris-SPARC uses a different disk TOC than Solaris-x86.
X86 disks use a disk label that is derived from the PC world,
with Master Boot Records, fdisk, partitions and the like; within
Hello,
I'm in a muddle over how solaris slices relate to the regular x86
partitions? Basically my understanding is that a single x86 disk partition
gets mapped as a single drive in solaris, and within that partition you can
chop it up into normal 8 slices.
So what happens if I pull o
Hello,
A few questions from a old sparc solaris 8 admin. I was at the london
TechDays ten days ago, I picked up a copy of OpenSolaris 10 b56, and I've
attempted to install this on several machines all seem to fail, here's a quick
of the problems I've encountered.
HP DL380G5 the
> Hy there!
> I have a little problem installing Solaris 10 on my system.
> I'm a complete n00b when it comes to Solaris,but I'm a fast learner so
> please bare with me.
> I got the ISO from the Solaris website.I burn it.I follow and follow the
> install steps until it asks me from what do I wish
Hy there!
I have a little problem installing Solaris 10 on my system.
I'm a complete n00b when it comes to Solaris,but I'm a fast learner so please
bare with me.
I got the ISO from the Solaris website.I burn it.I follow and follow the
install steps until it asks me from what do I wish to install
Well it does slightly defeat the purpose of an automatic link if nobody knows
what it is. To be honest, I thought the one on the download page *was* the
automatically updated version until I saw this thread.
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
> Why not make the one on the download page the automatically updated one???
A simple script run nightly would take care of that eh ?
makes sense to do I would think.
dc
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
Why not make the one on the download page the automatically updated one???
Andrew.
This message posted from opensolaris.org
___
opensolaris-discuss mailing list
opensolaris-discuss@opensolaris.org
> On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 04:55:29AM -0700, Andrew Pattison wrote:
>> > Incorrect.
>> > The site just sometimes doesn't update properly for
>> > some reason. Latest is always here:
>> > http://opensolaris.org/sxce_dvd
>>
>> Why is this "magic" URL up-to-date, yet the one on the download page
>> (h
On Sun, Mar 25, 2007 at 04:55:29AM -0700, Andrew Pattison wrote:
> > Incorrect.
> > The site just sometimes doesn't update properly for
> > some reason. Latest is always here:
> > http://opensolaris.org/sxce_dvd
>
> Why is this "magic" URL up-to-date, yet the one on the download page
> (http://w
That's exactly the model http://joyent.com/ are using
with their accelerators. Seems to be very well recieved
by their hosting customers (of which I'm one).
On 25/03/07, Adam Luzecki <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> One of the primary benefits of Containers is
> delegated administration.
> Think of
> Incorrect.
> The site just sometimes doesn't update properly for
> some reason. Latest is always here:
> http://opensolaris.org/sxce_dvd
Why is this "magic" URL up-to-date, yet the one on the download page
(http://www.opensolaris.org/os/downloads/sol_ex_dvd/) still points to build 59?
Cheers
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >Do you mean:
> >
> > sprintf(buf, "/proc/self/fd/%d/%s", dfd, dname);
> > dp = opendir(buf);
>
> Yes.
>
> >> Not sure why you have all the dup's in there.
> >
> >Because closedir() will also close the fd passed to fdopendir()
> >and I need the fd for a reliable
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>>
>> >Linux started to support openat() recently and for this reason,
>> >the best way of implementing a portable way of directory search without
>> >path length limitation is to use:
>> >
>> >ndfd = openat(dfd, "dname", O_RDONLY);
>> >close(dfd);
>> >dfd = ndfd;
>> >d
>
> >> but I admit I don't know the technical reasons why
> we have
> >> the requirements we have today to begin with.
> >
> > Because responsible folks don't listen to Moinak
> Ghosh's Belenix
> > minimize_Grub_bootImage - approach?
>
> The primary requirements are internationalization
> (only
> One of the primary benefits of Containers is
> delegated administration.
> Think of a company providing hosting services.
> Instead of providing each
> customer their own server, they can be provided with
> a Solaris
> container. Many customers can share resources on the
> same set of
> serve
19 matches
Mail list logo
